← 返回前沿论文

胶质瘤免疫治疗中从 LAK 到 CIK 的连续统一体:疗效与安全性结局的系统综述

英文原题:LAK to CIK continuum in glioma immunotherapy: a systematic review of efficacy and safety outcomes.

PubMed 2026/06/22(内容时间) J Transl Med Q1 · IF 9.7(JCR 2025)

研究概要

LAK和CIK疗法对胶质瘤患者均可能有益,其中CIK更安全且与更高的疗效相关。尽管需要更大规模的临床试验来巩固所观察到的结果。

研究思路结论见上方概要

针对胶质瘤(包括最具致死性的多形性胶质母细胞瘤(GBM))的免疫治疗,结合了固有免疫和适应性免疫应答,以增强全身性和宿主特异性免疫。在各种基于细胞的免疫治疗中,活化细胞疗法利用在体外激活的自体免疫细胞——如淋巴因子激活的杀伤(LAK)细胞、细胞因子诱导的杀伤(CIK)细胞和细胞毒性T淋巴细胞。尽管面临挑战,LAK为活化杀伤细胞疗法(如CIK细胞)的进一步发展奠定了基础。CIK细胞具有非MHC限制性裂解活性,可在体外快速扩增,并作为有前景的抗癌制剂进行给药。本系统综述旨在评估CIK和LAK为基础的免疫治疗在胶质瘤患者中的应用、其生物学演变路径,并在多个参数上比较这些疗法。

遵循PRISMA指南,使用四个主要在线数据库进行了截至2025年8月的全面文献检索。筛选和数据提取由两名独立评审员完成,质量评估采用Joanna Briggs Institute批判性评价工具进行评价。

在930篇初始论文中,共纳入21项研究,包括18项准实验研究、2项随机对照试验和1项队列研究。GBM是主要的胶质瘤亚型。LAK和CIK分别主要通过腔内和静脉给药。LAK治疗提高了生存率;然而,与CIK治疗相比,其并发症更多,这归因于IL-2联合给药等因素。两项研究中,双特异性抗体与LAK细胞联合给药,报告了更高的生存率。Hishi等人证明,50%的患者在三年后存活,40%无复发。评估CIK治疗的研究表明,基于MRI发现,无进展生存期(PFS)有显著改善,疾病控制率增加。Kong等人显示,PFS从对照组的5.4个月升至干预组的8.1个月,而总生存期从16.9个月改善至22.5个月。在CIK治疗组中未观察到炎症性细胞因子风暴或严重过敏反应。

展开英文摘要原文

BACKGROUND: Immunotherapy against gliomas, including Glioblastoma multiform (GBM) as the most lethal type combines innate and adaptive immune responses to strengthen systemic and host-specific immunity. Among various cell-based immunotherapies, activated cell therapies utilize autologous immune cells activated ex vivo-such as lymphokine-activated killer (LAK) cells, cytokine-induced killer (CIK) cells, and cytotoxic T lymphocytes. Despite challenges, LAK laid the groundwork for further progress in activated killer cell therapies, such as CIK cells. CIK cells with their MHC-independent lytic activity, can be rapidly expanded ex vivo and administered as promising anticancer agents. This systematic review aims to assess CIK and LAK-based immunotherapy in glioma patients, their biological evolutionary path, and to compare these therapies across several parameters. METHODS: Following the PRISMA guideline, a thorough literature search was implemented using four major online databases up to August 2025. Screening and data extraction was performed by two independent reviewers and the quality assessment was evaluated using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tool. RESULTS: Out of 930 initial papers, 21 studies including 18 quasi-experimental studies, 2 randomized controlled trials, and 1 cohort were selected. GBM was the predominant glioma subtype. LAKs and CIKs were mostly administered intracavitary and intravenously, respectively. LAK therapy increased survival; however, they presented more complications compared to CIK therapy, attributed to factors such as co-administration of IL-2. Bispecific antibodies were administered alongside LAK cells in two studies, which reported a higher survival rate. Hishi et al. demonstrated that 50% of the patients survived after three years, and 40% were free from recurrence. Studies evaluating CIK therapy demonstrated significant improvements in progression-free survival (PFS) and an increased disease control rate based on MRI findings. Kong et al. showed that PFS rose from 5.4 months in the control group to 8.1 months in the intervention group, while overall survival improved from 16.9 months to 22.5 months. No inflammatory cytokine storm or severe allergic reactions were observed in the CIK therapy groups. CONCLUSIONS: Both LAK and CIK therapies could be beneficial for glioma patients, with CIK being safer and associated with higher efficacy. Although larger clinical trials are needed to consolidate observed outcomes.

论文信息

作者
Hamidi S、Morsali S、Ghannadikhosh P、Darvishi A、Nour MA、Zafarabadi S、Rahmani M、Doustvandi MA
第一作者单位
Student Research Committee, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.Iran
通讯作者单位
Immunology Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran. Leili_aghebati_maleki@yahoo.com.Iran
文献类型
系统综述 · 非美国政府资助研究
期刊
Journal of translational medicine2026 Jun 22
原文标识
PubMed 42332740 · DOI 10.1186/s12967-026-08466-7