决定异体 CAR T 细胞排斥与扩增的细胞和分子机制
Cellular and molecular mechanisms determining allogeneic CAR T cell rejection and expansion.
我们评估了11例接受单一批次cemacabtagene ansegedleucel(cema-cel)治疗的大B细胞淋巴瘤患者,cemacabtagene ansegedleucel是一种异体抗CD19 CAR T产品。
英文原题:The trinity of T cell engagement: navigating the molecular and clinical landscape of CAR-T, TILs, and TCEs in the war against cancer.
癌症免疫疗法的出现从根本上重构了肿瘤学范式,从直接靶向肿瘤细胞动力学的药物转向赋能宿主免疫系统识别和清除恶性肿瘤的策略。
癌症免疫疗法的出现从根本上重构了肿瘤学范式,从直接靶向肿瘤细胞动力学的药物转向赋能宿主免疫系统识别和清除恶性肿瘤的策略。这场革命的核心是细胞毒性T淋巴细胞(CTL),如今通过工程化和自然选择的方式被用作强效的“活体药物”。本综述对T细胞驱动疗法的三大主导支柱进行了批判性、深入的审视:CAR-T 细胞疗法、TIL(肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞)疗法和T细胞衔接器(TCEs)。我们解构了定义每种方法的分子机制,对比了CAR-T细胞合成的、不依赖主要组织相容性复合体(MHC)的信号传导与TILs多样化的、MHC限制性的TCR库,以及双特异性TCEs提供的瞬时药理学桥接。虽然CAR-T疗法在血液系统恶性肿瘤中取得了历史性成功,但其向实体瘤的转化受到恶劣肿瘤微环境(TME)的严重制约,该微环境以代谢隔离、物理排斥和深度免疫抑制为特征。相反,TIL疗法提供了一种针对实体瘤量身定制的多克隆策略,但受限于复杂的生物制造物流和可变的肿瘤免疫原性。TCEs承诺了即用型可及性,但在持久性和靶向/脱靶毒性方面面临挑战。除临床结局外,我们还探讨了耐药性的病理生理学基础,包括抗原逃逸机制和T细胞耗竭程序。最后,我们提出,治愈性方案的未来在于合理的组合策略——整合先进的基因工程、代谢重编程以及像溶瘤病毒这样的TME调节剂——以克服实体瘤的多方面防御。
The advent of cancer immunotherapy has fundamentally restructured the oncological paradigm, moving away from agents that directly target tumor cell kinetics toward strategies that empower the host immune system to recognize and eliminate malignancy. Central to this revolution is the cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL), now harnessed as a potent "living drug" through engineered and naturally selected modalities. This review provides a critical, in-depth examination of the three dominant pillars of T cell-driven therapies: Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy, Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocyte (TIL) therapy, and T Cell Engagers (TCEs). We dismantle the molecular mechanisms defining each approach, contrasting the synthetic, major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-independent signaling of CAR-T cells with the diverse, MHC-restricted TCR repertoire of TILs, and the transient, pharmacologic bridging provided by bispecific TCEs. While CAR-T therapy has achieved historic success in hematologic malignancies, its translation to solid tumors is severely compromised by the hostile tumor microenvironment (TME), characterized by metabolic insulation, physical exclusion, and profound immunosuppression. Conversely, TIL therapy offers a polyclonal strategy tailored for solid tumors but is hindered by complex biomanufacturing logistics and variable tumor immunogenicity. TCEs promise off-the-shelf accessibility but face challenges regarding persistence and on-target/off-tumor toxicity. Beyond clinical outcomes, we explore the pathophysiological underpinnings of resistance, including antigen escape mechanisms and T cell exhaustion programs. Finally, we posit that the future of curative regimens lies in rational combinatorial strategies-integrating advanced genetic engineering, metabolic reprogramming, and TME-modulating agents like oncolytic viruses-to overcome the multifaceted defenses of solid tumors.
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。