决定异体 CAR T 细胞排斥与扩增的细胞和分子机制
Cellular and molecular mechanisms determining allogeneic CAR T cell rejection and expansion.
我们评估了11例接受单一批次cemacabtagene ansegedleucel(cema-cel)治疗的大B细胞淋巴瘤患者,cemacabtagene ansegedleucel是一种异体抗CD19 CAR T产品。
英文原题:Giant Cell Urothelial Carcinoma: Morphometric Insights and Associations With Aggressive Clinical Features.
Giant Cell Urothelial Carcinoma: Morphometric Insights and Associations With Aggressive Clinical Features.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
我们报告了最大的 GCUC 系列,包括 27 例 GCUC 和 27 例匹配的对照尿路上皮癌(CoUC)患者,其中大多数(>90%)随访超过 5 年,包括新辅助和辅助治疗状态。
巨细胞尿路上皮癌(GCUC)是一种极为罕见的组织学亚型,已报道50余例。迄今为止,已报道3个病例系列。化疗和免疫治疗反应的报道较少,结果不一。我们报告了最大的GCUC系列,包括27例GCUC和27例匹配的对照尿路上皮癌(CoUC)患者,其中大多数(>90%)随访超过5年,包括新辅助和辅助治疗状态。我们进一步表征了巨大肿瘤细胞与背景肿瘤细胞的核大小比值,并分析了尿路上皮分化标志物(GATA3、CK5/6)、p53、TIL(肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞)(CD19和CD3)以及治疗靶点(TROP2、Nectin4、PDL1和HER2)。巨大肿瘤细胞的形态学分析表明,它们平均比周围非巨大肿瘤细胞大12倍。GCUC显示出许多与CoUC相似的组织学和免疫表型特征。与CoUC相比,GCUC富集于更高的分期(T3/4和转移性疾病),并显示出比传统尿路上皮癌更差的OS趋势,但与伴有变异组织学的尿路上皮癌相似。GCUC包括3例低分期(T1/2)患者,其OS显著差于低分期CoUC,提示应进行早期全面检查和肿瘤学干预。化疗在GCUC和CoUC患者中均略微改善了OS,但无统计学意义。与CoUC相比,GCUC似乎有更多的肿瘤浸润T细胞,但无统计学意义。TROP2、Nectin4、PDL1和HER2的表达无差异。然而,一部分GCUC患者可能从靶向治疗(PDL1、Nectin4)中获益,值得进行更多队列研究。
Giant cell urothelial carcinoma (GCUC) is an exceedingly rare histologic subtype with 50+ reported cases. To date, 3 case series have been reported. Scant chemotherapy and immunotherapy responses were reported with variable results. We report the largest GCUC series, including 27 GCUC and 27 matched control urothelial carcinoma (CoUC) patients, most (>90%) of whom had more than 5 years of follow-up, including neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy status. We further characterized the nuclear size ratio of giant tumor cells to background tumor cells and analyzed urothelial differentiation markers (GATA3, CK5/6), p53, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (CD19 and CD3), and therapeutic targets (TROP2, Nectin4, PDL1, and HER2). Morphometric analysis of giant tumor cells demonstrated that they were, on average, 12 times larger than surrounding nongiant tumor cells. GCUC showed many histologic and immunophenotypic features similar to CoUC. GCUC was enriched for higher stages (T3/4 and metastatic disease) than CoUC and showed a trend toward worse OS than conventional urothelial carcinoma, but was similar to urothelial carcinoma with variant histology. GCUC included 3 low-stage (T1/2) patients, who had significantly worse OS than low-stage CoUC, suggesting early extensive workup and oncologic intervention. Chemotherapy slightly improved OS in both GCUC and CoUC patients without statistical significance. Compared with CoUC, GCUC appeared to have more tumor-infiltrating T cells, but without statistical significance. There were no expression differences in TROP2, Nectin4, PDL1, and HER2. However, a subset of GCUC patients might benefit from target therapies (PDL1, Nectin4), warranting more cohort studies.
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。