决定异体 CAR T 细胞排斥与扩增的细胞和分子机制
Cellular and molecular mechanisms determining allogeneic CAR T cell rejection and expansion.
我们评估了11例接受单一批次cemacabtagene ansegedleucel(cema-cel)治疗的大B细胞淋巴瘤患者,cemacabtagene ansegedleucel是一种异体抗CD19 CAR T产品。
英文原题:CD19/CD22 bivalent CAR T cells in children, adolescents and young adults with B-ALL: final phase 1 trial results.
在 B-ALL 患者中,20 例(71.4%)患者发生细胞因子释放综合征(CRS),仅 2 例(10%)为 > 3 级。
多抗原靶向嵌合抗原受体(CAR)T细胞已成为缓解单抗原靶向治疗后抗原逃逸的一种策略。我们此前在儿童、青少年和青年(CAYA)B细胞急性淋巴细胞白血病(B-ALL)患者中使用双价CD19.22.BB CAR T细胞构建体,发现CD22识别能力有限,但安全性可耐受且具有疗效,因此开展进一步评估。本试验纳入3–39岁复发/难治性B-ALL患者。剂量递增后,本报告纳入接受推荐2期剂量(RP2D,即3×10^6个转导CAR T细胞/kg)的患者。30例CAYA患者接受RP2D治疗,其中28例B-ALL、2例伯基特淋巴瘤。在B-ALL患者中,20例(71.4%)发生细胞因子释放综合征(CRS),其中仅2例(10%)为>3级;3例(10.7%)发生3级免疫效应细胞相关神经毒性综合征(ICANS);未发生免疫效应细胞相关噬血细胞性淋巴组织细胞增多症样综合征。方案修订后,研究评估siltuximab作为CRS一线治疗;1例患者接受siltuximab两剂后CRS完全消退,无需其他抗细胞因子治疗。25例(89.3%)患者达到微小残留病阴性完全缓解(CR),其中6例既未发生CRS也未发生ICANS。23例(82.1%)患者在CAR T输注后中位51天(范围45–68天)直接接受造血干细胞移植(HSCT),支持该构建体用作移植桥接治疗。3例无应答者均有持续的非中枢神经系统(CNS)髓外病变(EMD);7例非CNS EMD患者中有4例达到CR。25例CR患者的中位无复发生存期尚未达到;全部28例患者自输注起的中位OS为34个月(95% CI 17个月至无法估计)。本扩展研究显示CD19.22.BB CAR T细胞疗法安全且具有临床活性,尤其可用作HSCT桥接治疗。无应答局限于非CNS EMD患者,凸显有效靶向EMD的持续挑战,并可为未来CAR构建体设计提供依据。试验注册号:NCT03448393。
Multiantigen targeting chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells have emerged as a strategy to mitigate antigen escape observed after single antigen targeting therapy. Our initial experience with a bivalent CD19.22.BB CAR T-cell construct in children, adolescents and young adults (CAYA) with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) demonstrated limitations in CD22 recognition, but a tolerable safety profile and efficacy prompted further evaluation. This trial enrolled patients between the ages of 3-39 with relapsed/refractory B-ALL. Following dose-escalation, patients who enrolled at the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of 3 10 6 transduced CAR T cells/kg constitute this report. 30 CAYA were treated at the RP2D; 28 with B-ALL and 2 with Burkitt lymphoma. Across patients with B-ALL, 20 (71.4%) patients developed cytokine release syndrome (CRS); only 2 (10%) were grade > 3. Grade 3 immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) occurred in 3 (10.7%) patients; there were no cases of immune effector cell-associated hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis-like syndrome. Following a protocol amendment to evaluate the efficacy of siltuximab as a first-line treatment of CRS, one patient received siltuximab with full resolution of CRS after two doses without needing additional anti-cytokine-directed therapies. A measurable residual disease-negative complete remission (CR) was attained in 25 (89.3%) patients, including 6 who had neither CRS nor ICANS. 23 patients (82.1%) proceeded directly to hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) following CAR T-cell infusion within a median of 51 days (range, 45-68 days), supporting the utility of this construct as a bridge to HSCT. All three non-responders had persistent non-central nervous system (CNS) extramedullary disease (EMD), although four of seven patients with non-CNS EMD achieved a CR. Median relapse-free survival among the 25 patients achieving CR was not reached, and the median overall survival for all 28 patients was 34 months (95% CI 17 to not estimable) from infusion. This extended experience demonstrates that CD19.22.BB CAR T-cell therapy is safe and clinically active, particularly as a bridge to HSCT. Non-response was confined to patients with non-CNS EMD, highlighting the persistent challenge of effectively targeting EMD and informing the design of future CAR constructs. Trial registration number NCT03448393.
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。