抗 CD22/CD19 CAR-T 细胞疗法 CART2219.1 在成人和儿童复发/难治性 B-ALL 中的 I/II 期试验
A Phase I/II Trial of Anti-CD22/CD19 CAR-T Cell Therapy, CART2219.1, in Adult and Pediatric Relapsed/Refractory B-ALL.
在一项多中心I/II期试验中,所有患者(n=11;7名儿童,4名成人)在第28天均达到完全缓解(91%为微小残留病阴性)。
英文原题:Understanding access to novel high-cost cancer therapies across Canada: a national survey of pediatric oncology providers.
加拿大儿童获得循证癌症治疗的机会仍然不均衡。统一资助、简化审批流程,以及建立加拿大PBT中心以减少旅途负担,将确保及时、公平地获得高成本治疗。
许多针对儿童癌症的循证高成本疗法,包括靶向药物、质子束治疗(PBT)和细胞治疗(CT),在加拿大并未获得公共资金支持。本研究旨在识别获取这些疗法的差异和障碍,以及改善儿童高成本疗法可及性的关键卫生政策变化。
我们在加拿大16个儿童肿瘤中心开展了一项基于在线横断面情景调查的儿科肿瘤医疗服务提供者研究。情景调查探讨了获取有证据支持但未普遍资助的疗法的途径:blinatumomab用于B细胞急性淋巴细胞白血病(B-ALL)低危复发,larotrectinib用于TRK融合软组织肉瘤,PBT用于不可切除的头颈部肉瘤,以及tisagenlecleucel用于一例唐氏综合征患者B-ALL首次复发。主要结局是每种疗法的可及性,定义为患者能够接受指定疗法;次要结局包括获取时间、资金来源和感知障碍。
来自15个中心的70名参与者被纳入,其中68名(应答率=97%)完成了至少一个调查问题。大多数受访者是儿童肿瘤内科医生(31/68,45.6%)。医疗服务提供者报告的可及率为:blinatumomab为89%(n=35),larotrectinib为79%(n=27),PBT为59.2%(n=30),tisagenlecleucel为94%(n=30)。获取blinatumomab、PBT和tisagenlecleucel的主要障碍包括患者/家庭无法出行,以及出行的经济和社会心理影响。larotrectinib的高成本是一个显著障碍。
INTRODUCTION: Many evidence-informed high-cost therapies for childhood cancer, including targeted drugs, proton beam therapy (PBT), and cellular therapy (CT) are not publicly funded in Canada. This study aimed to identify disparities and barriers to access, and key health policy changes to improve access to high-cost therapies for children. METHODS: We conducted an online cross-sectional vignette-based survey among pediatric oncology providers at 16 Canadian pediatric oncology centres. Vignettes explored access to evidence-informed but not universally funded therapies: blinatumomab for low-risk relapse of B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL), larotrectinib for TRK-fused soft tissue sarcoma, PBT for unresectable head-and-neck sarcoma, and tisagenlecleucel for first relapse of B-ALL in a patient with Down syndrome. The primary outcome was access to each therapy, defined as the patient's ability to receive the specified therapy; secondary outcomes included time to access, funding sources, and perceived barriers. RESULTS: Seventy participants were enrolled from 15 centres, with 68 (response rate = 97%) completing at least one survey question. Most respondents were pediatric medical oncologists (31/68, 45.6%). Provider-reported access rates were 89% for blinatumomab ( n = 35), 79% for larotrectinib ( n = 27), 59.2% for PBT ( n = 30), and 94% for tisagenlecleucel ( n = 30). Key barriers to accessing blinatumomab, PBT, and tisagenlecleucel included patient/family inability to travel, and the economic and psychosocial impact of travel. High cost of larotrectinib was a notable barrier. CONCLUSIONS: Access to evidence-informed cancer therapies for Canadian children remains variable. Universal funding, simplified approval processes, and the establishment of Canadian PBT centres to reduce travel burden, would ensure timely, equitable access to high-cost therapies.
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。