决定异体 CAR T 细胞排斥与扩增的细胞和分子机制
Cellular and molecular mechanisms determining allogeneic CAR T cell rejection and expansion.
我们评估了11例接受单一批次cemacabtagene ansegedleucel(cema-cel)治疗的大B细胞淋巴瘤患者,cemacabtagene ansegedleucel是一种异体抗CD19 CAR T产品。
英文原题:Efficacy and safety of CD30-targeted chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy for lymphoma: a meta-analysis.
CD30 靶向 CAR-T 疗法在淋巴瘤患者中显示出令人鼓舞的客观缓解率,且毒性可控。
背景:CD30靶向CAR-T 细胞疗法对淋巴瘤患者的临床获益仍存在争议。本荟萃分析旨在全面评估CD30靶向CAR-T疗法在此类患者中的疗效和安全性。 方法:全面检索Web of Science、PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆数据库中截至2025年3月发表的淋巴瘤CD30靶向CAR-T研究。进行单臂荟萃分析,计算合并比例及95%置信区间(CI)。采用I²统计量评估异质性,并据此使用固定效应或随机效应模型。提取并分析疗效和安全性结局。 结果:本荟萃分析纳入7项研究,共102例患者。完全缓解、部分缓解、疾病稳定和疾病进展的合并率(95% CI)分别为43.5%(17.6%–69.3%)、17.5%(3.0%–31.9%)、17.8%(3.0%–32.6%)和10.7%(4.8%–16.6%)。合并客观缓解率(95% CI)和疾病控制率(95% CI)分别为66.1%(46.4%–85.9%)和89.3%(83.4%–95.2%)。安全性方面,细胞因子释放综合征、恶心或呕吐、贫血和血小板减少的合并发生率(95% CI)分别为57.7%(37.7%–77.8%)、38.2%(11.3%–65.1%)、79.1%(48.0%–100.0%)和70.2%(36.1%–100.0%)。所有结局指标均未发现发表偏倚(均P>0.05)。质量评估显示,所有纳入研究的质量均为中至高;敏感性分析也表明结果稳健性较高。 结论:CD30靶向CAR-T疗法在淋巴瘤患者中显示出良好的客观缓解率,且毒性可管理。本荟萃分析为未来临床研究和CD30靶向CAR-T疗法在淋巴瘤中的探索性应用提供了初步描述性证据。
BACKGROUND: The clinical benefits of cluster of differentiation 30 (CD30)-target chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy in patients with lymphoma remain controversial. This meta-analysis intended to comprehensively investigate the efficacy and safety of CD30-targeted CAR-T therapy in these patients. METHODS: Studies on CD30-targeted CAR-T therapy for patients with lymphoma were searched comprehensively in Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases until March 2025. A single-arm meta-analysis was performed to calculate pooled proportions with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Heterogeneity was assessed using the I statistic, and fixed- or random-effects models were applied accordingly. Efficacy and safety outcomes were extracted and analyzed. RESULTS: A total of seven studies containing 102 cases were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled rates (95% CI) of complete response, partial response, stable disease, and progressive disease were 43.5% (17.6%; 69.3%), 17.5% (3.0%; 31.9%), 17.8% (3.0%; 32.6%), 10.7% (4.8%; 16.6%), respectively. The pooled objective response rate (95% CI) and disease control rate (95% CI) were 66.1% (46.4%; 85.9%) and 89.3% (83.4%; 95.2%). Regarding safety results, the pooled incidences (95% CI) of cytokine release syndrome, nausea or vomiting, anemia, and thrombocytopenia were 57.7% (37.7%; 77.8%), 38.2% (11.3%; 65.1%), 79.1% (48.0%; 100.0%), and 70.2% (36.1%; 100.0%), respectively. No publication bias was observed in any outcome measures (all P > 0.05). Quality assessment showed that all included studies were of moderate-to-high quality. Moreover, sensitivity analyses exhibited high robustness of results. CONCLUSION: CD30-targeted CAR-T therapy demonstrates promising objective response rates with manageable toxicities in patients with lymphoma. The findings of this meta-analysis provide preliminary descriptive evidence to inform future clinical research and exploratory application of CD30-targeted CAR-T therapy in lymphoma.
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。