← 返回前沿论文

CD38 靶向 CAR-T 细胞治疗多发性骨髓瘤的疗效与安全性:系统综述与荟萃分析

英文原题:Efficacy and safety of CD38-directed CAR-T cell therapy for multiple myeloma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PubMed 2026/04/29(内容时间) Front Oncol Q2 · IF 3.4(JCR 2025)

研究概要

双靶点 CD38/BCMA CAR-T 在 RRMM 中显示出有前景的疗效和可控的安全性。

中文摘要

背景:尽管治疗取得进展,复发/难治性多发性骨髓瘤(RRMM)仍是临床挑战。靶向 CD38 的嵌合抗原受体(CAR)T 细胞疗法,尤其是 CD38/BCMA 双靶向构建体,是一种新兴免疫治疗策略。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估 CD38 靶向 CAR-T 治疗 RRMM 的疗效和安全性。 方法:系统检索 Medline、Embase 和 Cochrane Library,检索截至 2025 年 10 月 1 日。纳入评估单靶点 CD38 或 CD38/BCMA 双靶点 CAR-T 治疗 RRMM 的临床试验。采用随机效应模型合并双靶点研究的疗效和安全性结局;单靶点 CD38 数据进行描述性总结。 结果:共纳入 4 项研究、70 名患者(3 项 CD38/BCMA 双靶点研究,n=61;1 项 CD38 单靶点研究,n=9)。双靶点 CD38/BCMA CAR-T 的合并总缓解率(ORR)为 89%(95% CI:81%–97%),完全缓解/严格完全缓解(CR/sCR)率为 63%(95% CI:44%–82%),微小残留病(MRD)阴性率为 67%;死亡率为 11%。单靶点 CD38 CAR-T 疗效较低(ORR=33%),死亡率较高(44%)。任何级别细胞因子释放综合征(CRS)发生率为 83%,其中 3 级 CRS 为 26%。其他不良事件包括感染(23%)、免疫效应细胞相关神经毒性综合征(ICANS,13%)和肾损伤(13%)。 结论:双靶点 CD38/BCMA CAR-T 在 RRMM 中显示出有希望的疗效,安全性可管理。单靶点 CD38 CAR-T 的证据仍有限,需谨慎解读。需要进一步开展大规模比较研究,以确定 CD38 靶向 CAR-T 在 RRMM 治疗序列中的最佳位置。

展开英文摘要原文

BACKGROUND: Relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) remains a clinical challenge despite therapeutic advances. CD38-directed chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy, especially dual-target CD38/BCMA constructs, represents an emerging immunotherapeutic strategy. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CD38-directed CAR-T in RRMM. METHODS: We systematically searched Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library up to October 1, 2025. Eligible clinical trials investigating CD38-directed CAR-T (single-target or dual-target CD38/BCMA) for RRMM were included. Random-effects model was used to pool efficacy and safety outcomes of dual-target studies, while single-target CD38 data were summarized descriptively. RESULTS: A total of 4 studies involving 70 patients were included (3 dual-target CD38/BCMA studies, n=61; 1 single-target CD38 study, n=9). For dual-target CD38/BCMA CAR-T, the pooled overall response rate (ORR) was 89% (95% CI: 81%-97%), complete response/stringent complete response (CR/sCR) rate was 63% (95% CI: 44%-82%), and minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative rate was 67%. Mortality was 11%. The single-target CD38 CAR-T showed lower efficacy (ORR = 33%) and higher mortality (44%). Any-grade cytokine release syndrome (CRS) occurred in 83% of patients, with grade 3 CRS in 26%. Other adverse events included infections (23%), immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS, 13%), and kidney injury (13%). CONCLUSION: Dual-target CD38/BCMA CAR-T demonstrates promising efficacy and manageable safety in RRMM. Evidence for single-target CD38 CAR-T remains limited and requires cautious interpretation. Further large-scale comparative studies are warranted to determine the optimal role of CD38-directed CAR-T in RRMM treatment sequencing.

论文信息

作者
Xu X、Dong C、Guo J、Chang X、Zhang Y、Gou S、Xue L、Li J
第一作者单位
Graduate School, Hebei North University, Zhangjiakou, China.China
通讯作者单位
Department of Hematology, Hebei General Hospital, Shijiazhuang, China.China
文献类型
系统综述
期刊
Frontiers in oncology2026
原文标识
PubMed 42137138 · DOI 10.3389/fonc.2026.1744250