决定异体 CAR T 细胞排斥与扩增的细胞和分子机制
Cellular and molecular mechanisms determining allogeneic CAR T cell rejection and expansion.
我们评估了11例接受单一批次cemacabtagene ansegedleucel(cema-cel)治疗的大B细胞淋巴瘤患者,cemacabtagene ansegedleucel是一种异体抗CD19 CAR T产品。
英文原题:Exploring current evidence on bispecific CAR-T cell therapy for acute leukemias: a systematic review.
双特异性CAR-T细胞疗法在管理急性白血病方面比传统CAR-T细胞更有效。未来的研究应侧重于开发多样化的靶点并推进至临床试验。
CAR-T 细胞(CAR-T细胞)疗法是一种用于急性白血病的免疫疗法,利用针对参与T细胞功能的抗原具有特异性的重组受体,引导肿瘤细胞的识别和清除。然而,其主要局限性包括因抗原逃逸和肿瘤异质性导致的复发,以及靶向非肿瘤效应。双特异性CAR-T细胞被开发以克服这些问题。
通过检索三个数据库(PubMed、Scopus、ProQuest)在2016年至2025年间识别相关文章,进行了文献检索。纳入以英文撰写且采用体内、体外和临床试验研究设计的研究。排除数据不完整和病例报告的文章。该系统综述遵循PRISMA指南。
最终纳入9项研究。双特异性CAR-T细胞疗法在AML和ALL中均表现出更优的肿瘤清除能力和更低的副作用。AML中使用的CAR多靶向CD123和CD33;开发更多样化的靶点,包括肿瘤生长的细胞信号传导(FLT3、NKG2D、TIM3、FR),以应对异质性。CD19是ALL中最常见的CAR靶点,此外还靶向CD22、CD20和BAFF-R;应对CD19阴性复发非常普遍。CD19/CD22双特异性CAR-T细胞已完成I期临床试验,证明有效且细胞因子释放综合征、神经毒性或其他不良反应的发生率较低。临床前试验表明,双特异性CAR-T细胞具有更长的体内持久性。
INTRODUCTION: Chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T cell) therapy is an immunotherapy for acute leukemias utilizing recombinant receptors specific to antigens involved in T-cell function to direct tumor cell recognition and elimination. However, major limitations include relapse due to antigen escape and tumor heterogeneity, as well as on-target off-tumor effects. Bispecific CAR-T cells are developed to overcome these issues. METHOD: A literature search was conducted to identify relevant articles using three databases (PubMed, Scopus, ProQuest) between 2016 and 2025. Studies written in English and in vivo , in vitro , and clinical trial research designs were included. Articles without complete data and case reports were excluded. The systematic review followed PRISMA guidelines. RESULTS: Nine studies were included in the final synthesis. Bispecific CAR-T cell therapy was superior in tumor eradication and limiting adverse effects in both AML and ALL. CARs used in AML often targeted CD123 and CD33; development of more diverse targets, including cell signaling of tumor growth (FLT3, NKG2D, TIM3, FR ), addressed heterogeneity. CD19 was the most common CAR in ALL, additionally targeting CD22, CD20, and BAFF-R; addressing CD19-negative relapse was quite common. Phase I clinical trials were done for CD19/CD22 bispecific CAR-T cells, proving effective with low incidence of cytokine release syndrome, neurotoxicity, or other adverse effects. Preclinical trials showed that bispecific CAR-T cells had longer in vivo persistence. CONCLUSION: Bispecific CAR-T cell therapy is more effective in managing acute leukemias than conventional CAR-T cells. Future research should focus on developing diverse targets and advancing into clinical trials. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: Open Science Framework (OSF) Registries https://osf.io/, registration DOI: https://doi.org/10.17605.
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。