← 返回前沿论文

基线血小板与淋巴细胞比值与接受抗 CD19 CAR-T 细胞治疗的弥漫大 B 细胞淋巴瘤患者的重度免疫效应细胞相关毒性相关

英文原题:Baseline platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio is associated with severe immune effector cell-associated toxicities in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients receiving anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy.

查看英文原题

Baseline platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio is associated with severe immune effector cell-associated toxicities in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients receiving anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy.

PubMed 2026/03/24(内容时间) Front Immunol Q1 · IF 7(JCR 2025)

研究概要

基线PLR可能代表一种简单易得的生物标志物,与CAR T细胞治疗后发生严重免疫相关毒性的风险增加相关。这些发现支持其在输注前风险分层中的潜在作用,但仍需在更大队列中验证。

研究思路结论见上方概要

抗CD19嵌合抗原受体(CAR)T细胞疗法可使复发或难治性弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)患者获得持久缓解;然而,包括细胞因子释放综合征(CRS)和神经毒性在内的严重免疫效应细胞相关不良事件仍是主要的临床挑战。我们研究了血小板与淋巴细胞比值(PLR)是否可作为严重毒性的预测性生物标志物。

在这项回顾性研究中,分析了15例接受tisagenlecleucel治疗的复发或难治性DLBCL患者。PLR在淋巴细胞清除前进行测量。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)分析确定预测严重免疫相关不良事件的最佳PLR截断值。

最佳PLR截断值为198,灵敏度为85.7%,特异度为87.5%。与PLR值较低的患者相比,基线PLR值较高的患者严重不良事件发生率显著更高(85.7% vs. 12.5%)。基线PLR与输注后血清铁蛋白升高呈正相关,血清铁蛋白是全身性炎症的替代标志物。与其他炎症生物标志物相比,PLR表现出中等的灵敏度-特异度权衡。

展开英文摘要原文

INTRODUCTION: Anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy can induce durable remissions in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL); however, severe immune effector cell-associated adverse events, including cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurotoxicity, remain major clinical challenges. We investigated whether the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) could serve as a predictive biomarker for severe toxicities. METHODS: In this retrospective study, 15 patients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL treated with tisagenlecleucel were analyzed. PLR was measured prior to lymphodepletion. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to determine the optimal PLR cutoff for predicting severe immune-related adverse events. RESULTS: The optimal PLR cutoff was 198, with a sensitivity of 85.7% and a specificity of 87.5%. Patients with higher baseline PLR values had a significantly higher incidence of severe adverse events compared with those with lower PLR values (85.7% vs. 12.5%). Baseline PLR was positively correlated with post-infusion increases in serum ferritin, a surrogate marker of systemic inflammation. Compared with other inflammatory biomarkers, PLR demonstrated an intermediate sensitivity-specificity trade-off. CONCLUSION: Baseline PLR may represent a simple and accessible biomarker associated with an increased risk of severe immune-related toxicities following CAR T-cell therapy. These findings support its potential role in pre-infusion risk stratification, although validation in larger cohorts is warranted.

论文信息

作者
Kim C、Kwak K、Kang KW、Park Y、Kim BS、Choi YS
单位
Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.South Korea
期刊
Frontiers in immunology2026
原文标识
PubMed 41953008 · DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2026.1731711