决定异体 CAR T 细胞排斥与扩增的细胞和分子机制
Cellular and molecular mechanisms determining allogeneic CAR T cell rejection and expansion.
我们评估了11例接受单一批次cemacabtagene ansegedleucel(cema-cel)治疗的大B细胞淋巴瘤患者,cemacabtagene ansegedleucel是一种异体抗CD19 CAR T产品。
英文原题:Immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome: integrative mechanisms, predictive biomarkers, and translational pathways for prevention in CAR T-cell therapy.
免疫效应细胞相关神经毒性综合征(ICANS)是嵌合抗原受体(CAR)T细胞治疗常见且有时严重的并发症。
免疫效应细胞相关神经毒性综合征(ICANS)是嵌合抗原受体(CAR)T细胞治疗常见且有时严重的并发症。尽管我们的认识已显著进步,ICANS在生物学上仍然复杂,在临床上仍具有异质性。在本综述中,我们综合了当前关于系统性免疫激活、内皮损伤、血脑屏障破坏和神经炎症如何共同导致受累患者出现神经系统症状的证据。我们总结了血浆、脑脊液、脑电图(EEG)和神经影像学中新兴的预测性生物标志物,并将其组织在一个时间框架内,以突出不同信号出现的时间以及它们如何支持更早期的识别。我们还将ICANS与肿瘤炎症相关神经毒性(TIAN)加以区分,后者是一种更常见于中枢神经系统肿瘤患者的综合征,强调其在发病机制、表现和管理方面的关键差异。最后,我们讨论了多模式风险预测的概念性方法以及目前限制临床实施的实际挑战,包括检测周转时间、跨CAR构建体和疾病背景的普适性、可解释性,以及在依据预测风险采取行动时的伦理考量。我们提出了一条务实的路线图,优先开展前瞻性生物标志物指导的研究、标准化检测平台和透明的建模策略,以帮助该领域从观察走向更安全的预防。总之,这一整合性视角旨在阐明ICANS的生物学、为新兴生物标志物提供背景,并支持更明智、更安全地使用CAR T细胞治疗。
Immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) is a common and sometimes severe complication of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy. Although our understanding has advanced considerably, ICANS remains biologically complex and clinically variable. In this review, we synthesize current evidence on how systemic immune activation, endothelial injury, disruption of the blood-brain barrier, and neuroinflammation converge to produce neurological symptoms in affected patients. We summarize emerging predictive biomarkers across plasma, cerebrospinal fluid, electroencephalography (EEG), and neuroimaging, and organize them within a temporal framework to highlight when different signals arise and how they may support earlier recognition. We also differentiate ICANS from tumor inflammation-associated neurotoxicity (TIAN), a syndrome more frequently observed in patients with central nervous system tumors, underscoring key differences in pathogenesis, presentation, and management. Finally, we discuss conceptual approaches to multimodal risk prediction and the practical challenges that currently limit clinical implementation, including assay turnaround time, generalizability across CAR constructs and disease settings, interpretability, and ethical considerations when acting on predicted risk. We propose a pragmatic roadmap that prioritizes prospective biomarker-guided studies, standardized assay platforms, and transparent modeling strategies to help move the field from observation toward safer prevention. Taken together, this integrative perspective aims to clarify the biology of ICANS, contextualize emerging biomarkers, and support more informed and safer use of CAR T-cell therapy.
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。