决定异体 CAR T 细胞排斥与扩增的细胞和分子机制
Cellular and molecular mechanisms determining allogeneic CAR T cell rejection and expansion.
我们评估了11例接受单一批次cemacabtagene ansegedleucel(cema-cel)治疗的大B细胞淋巴瘤患者,cemacabtagene ansegedleucel是一种异体抗CD19 CAR T产品。
英文原题:Time to access matters: patient gains from faster CAR T-cell reimbursement in Europe.
欧洲各国对 CAR-T 细胞疗法的可及性差异很大。
**背景:**尽管嵌合抗原受体(CAR)T细胞疗法具有临床疗效和成本效果,但欧洲各国报销审批所需时间差异很大。本研究考察这些差异,并量化加快治疗可及性对患者的潜在获益。 **方法:**通过针对性文献检索,收集截至2024年10月1日所有已批准CAR-T适应证的报销状态。评估报销决策时间(TTRD),定义为上市许可至发布报销决定之间的时间。以决策最快的3个国家TTRD为基准,估算CAR-T最初3项获批适应证的患者潜在获益,包括挽救生命、增加生命年(LY)及长期生存者;根据人口规模、发病率、CAR-T治疗资格和市场份额计算总体影响。另进行不同TTRD假设下的情景分析。 **结果:**在确定的12项CAR-T适应证中,法国、德国和瑞士TTRD最快,丹麦、荷兰和爱尔兰最慢。对于弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)三线及以后治疗、套细胞淋巴瘤(MCL)和儿童ALL这3项适应证,若各国可及速度达到最快3国水平,估计在每年6,594名新发患者中,可能增加1,199名存活者、1,222名长期生存者并带来37,229生命年。 **结论:**欧洲各国CAR-T可及性差异显著,加快患者获得治疗可带来重要健康获益。为确保创新疗法及时且公平可及,生产企业和卫生技术评估(HTA)机构需主动协调,可考虑替代定价模式和风险共担协议等机制。 **通俗摘要:**CAR-T是某些血癌的一次性高潜力治疗,但费用高,长期效果仍在研究,因此患者获得治疗可能延迟。本研究比较欧洲各国审批CAR-T报销所需时间,并估算加快决策对患者的潜在获益。12项获批用途中,德国、瑞士和法国均覆盖全部适应证(100%),丹麦、爱尔兰和荷兰仅覆盖3项(25%)。各国决策时间差异也很大:法国、德国和瑞士最快,丹麦、荷兰和爱尔兰较慢。在12个欧洲国家中,若加快前三项获批疾病治疗的报销决策,估计可多挽救约1,200人,并使约1,220人长期存活,累计增加约37,000生命年。这提示欧洲不同地区患者获得创新治疗的机会并不相同。为帮助急需CAR-T的患者,各国需调整政策和资金安排,使治疗更易获得并确保公平。
BACKGROUND: Despite clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness, time to reimbursement for chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies varies greatly across Europe. We examined these differences, and quantified potential patient benefits with faster access. METHODS: A targeted literature search collated reimbursement statuses for all approved CAR T-cell therapy indications by 1 October 2024. Time to reimbursement decision (TTRD), defined as time between marketing authorization and published reimbursement decision, was assessed. By benchmarking against the TTRD of the three fastest countries, patient impact, in the form of potential gains in lives, life-years (LYs) and long-term survivors, for the first three approved indications for CAR T-cell therapies were estimated. Each outcome was multiplied by population size, incidence, CAR T-cell eligibility, and market share to obtain population-level impact. Scenario analyses were conducted by examining different TTRD assumptions. RESULTS: Across 12 identified indications for CAR T-cell therapy, France, Germany, and Switzerland had the fastest TTRD, compared to Denmark, the Netherlands, and Ireland which had the slowest. Among an estimated annual incident population of 6,594 across 3 L + diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), and pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), 1,199 lives, 1,222 long-term survivorships, and 37,229 LYs, could potentially be gained by ensuring time to access across these countries was equivalent to the fastest three assessors in these 3L + DLBCL, MCL, and pediatric ALL. CONCLUSION: Access to CAR T-cell therapies varied widely across European countries. Faster access to these therapies can result in significant health gains. Ensuring prompt and equitable access to innovative therapies requires proactive alignments between manufacturers and HTA bodies, possibly through mechanisms such alternative pricing models and risk-sharing agreements. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies are a one time, highly promising treatment for certain blood cancers, but it is costly and its long term effects are still being studied. These challenges have slowed patients receipt of these therapies. This study examines how long European countries take to approve payment for CAR T cell therapy and estimates how much patients could gain if these decisions were made more quickly. We found that not all countries agreed to pay for CAR T cell therapies. Out of the 12 approved uses for these treatments, Germany, Switzerland, and France covered all of them (100%), while Denmark, Ireland, and the Netherlands covered only three (25%). We also saw big differences in how long countries took to make these decisions: France, Germany, and Switzerland acted the fastest, while Denmark, the Netherlands, and Ireland took much longer. Across 12 European countries, speeding up decisions to pay for CAR T cell therapy in the first three approved diseases could save about 1,200 lives and allow around 1,220 more people to survive their cancer. Patients could also gain roughly 37,000 extra years of life overall. These findings suggest that people across Europe may not have the same chance to receive these innovative treatments. To help patients who urgently need CAR T cell therapy, European countries will need to adjust their policies and funding approaches so the treatment is easier to access, and is fair for all patients.
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。