← 返回前沿论文

多发性骨髓瘤中的双抗原靶向 T 细胞免疫治疗:规避肿瘤异质性和预防抗原逃逸

英文原题:Dual-antigen-targeting T-cell immunotherapies in MM: circumventing tumor heterogeneity and preventing antigen escape.

PubMed 2026/05/07(内容时间) Blood Q1 · IF 23.9(JCR 2025)

研究概要

双靶向最终应在大规模 III 期试验中,与靶点转换的单靶向药物序贯治疗这一经典方案进行比较。

中文摘要

靶向B细胞成熟抗原(BCMA)或G蛋白偶联受体C类第5组成员D(GPRC5D)的T细胞免疫疗法,显著改善了复发/难治性多发性骨髓瘤(MM)患者生存。尽管有所进展,仍有一部分患者无应答,大多数患者最终会复发。肿瘤异质性可快速筛选出抗原阴性和低表达细胞,是单一肿瘤相关抗原靶向T细胞免疫疗法的一大问题。此外,接受嵌合抗原受体(CAR)T细胞输注后或双特异性抗体(BsAb)治疗期间疾病进展的患者,常出现由缺失、突变或表观遗传改变造成的抗原逃逸。同步靶向两种肿瘤相关抗原可应对靶点表达异质性并防止抗原逃逸,可能提高疗效。目前MM中正评估多种双靶向策略,包括联合使用两种单抗原靶向BsAb。值得注意的是,在相似患者人群中,teclistamab联合talquetamab的抗MM活性似乎强于相应常规单药BsAb。此外,重定向T细胞的三特异性抗体(如ramantamig [BCMA×GPRC5D]和ISB 2001 [BCMA×CD38])已在经多线治疗的MM中显示有前景的结果。小样本研究显示,具有两个以上抗原特异性的CAR-T细胞产品对晚期MM也有效;但目前尚无双靶向CAR-T产品被证明明显优于单独使用ciltacabtagene autoleucel靶向BCMA。未来应在大型III期试验中,将双靶向策略与经典的靶点切换、序贯单靶向药物方案进行比较。

展开英文摘要原文

B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)- or G protein-coupled receptor class C group 5 member D (GPRC5D)-directed T-cell immunotherapies have substantially improved the survival of patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM). Despite these advances, a subset of patients does not respond, and most patients will eventually relapse. Tumor heterogeneity, resulting in rapid selection of both antigen-negative and antigen-low cells, is a critical issue affecting response to T-cell immunotherapies targeting single tumor-associated antigens. In addition, antigen escape (due to deletions, mutations, or epigenetic alterations) is frequently observed in patients who experience disease progression after chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell infusion or during bispecific antibody (BsAb) treatment. Simultaneous targeting of 2 tumor-associated antigens may improve efficacy by addressing heterogeneous target expression and preventing antigen escape. Various dual-targeting strategies are currently evaluated in MM, including the combination of 2 single-antigen-targeting BsAbs. Of note, the efficacy of the combination of teclistamab and talquetamab appears to have enhanced anti-MM activity, compared with the corresponding conventional BsAbs alone in similar patient populations. Furthermore, dual-antigen targeting with T-cell-redirecting trispecific antibodies (eg, ramantamig [BCMA GPRC5D] and ISB 2001 [BCMA CD38]) has already demonstrated promising results in heavily pretreated MM. Studies with limited numbers of patients have demonstrated that CAR T-cell products with specificity for >1 antigen are also effective in advanced MM; however, at this time, none of the dual-targeting CAR T-cell products has been shown to be clearly superior to targeting BCMA alone with ciltacabtagene autoleucel. Dual targeting should eventually be compared in large phase 3 trials with the classical approach of serial treatment with monotargeting agents with target switch.

论文信息

作者
van de Donk NWCJ、Sonneveld P、Einsele H
第一作者单位
Department of Hematology, Amsterdam University Medical Center Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.Netherlands
通讯作者单位
Department of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.Germany
文献类型
综述
期刊
Blood2026 May 7
原文标识
PubMed 41610427 · DOI 10.1182/blood.2025032536