决定异体 CAR T 细胞排斥与扩增的细胞和分子机制
Cellular and molecular mechanisms determining allogeneic CAR T cell rejection and expansion.
我们评估了11例接受单一批次cemacabtagene ansegedleucel(cema-cel)治疗的大B细胞淋巴瘤患者,cemacabtagene ansegedleucel是一种异体抗CD19 CAR T产品。
英文原题:Treatment-related outcomes and patterns of relapse in secondary CNS involvement by large B-cell lymphoma.
Treatment-related outcomes and patterns of relapse in secondary CNS involvement by large B-cell lymphoma.
这些数据支持在符合条件的患者中采用 thiotepa-ASCT,尤其是新发疾病和中枢神经系统孤立性复发患者。
大B细胞淋巴瘤继发中枢神经系统(CNS)受累(SCNSL)可在初诊时出现、表现为单纯CNS复发,或表现为CNS与全身同步复发。SCNSL后果严重,目前尚无治疗共识,因此本研究评估国际队列中的治疗结局。研究报告无进展生存期(PFS)、总生存期(OS)和采用竞争风险模型估算的复发累积发生率(CIR),并通过6个月界标多变量分析识别预后因素。采用倾向评分匹配(PSM)比较复发时接受噻替哌预处理自体干细胞移植(ASCT)与嵌合抗原受体(CAR)T细胞治疗的结局。分析共纳入1,139例患者(初诊SCNSL 537例;复发SCNSL 602例)。初诊SCNSL、单纯CNS复发及同步复发的2年PFS估计值分别为40.4%、43.9%和16.2%。单纯CNS复发患者全身复发率较低(24个月CIR为6%)。噻替哌-ASCT与初诊SCNSL患者更长生存相关(PFS HR=0.57,P=0.005;OS HR=0.62,P=0.023),也与单纯CNS复发患者更长生存相关(PFS HR=0.55,P=0.002;OS HR=0.39,P<0.0001)。ASCT(无论是否采用噻替哌)也与同步复发患者生存改善相关(PFS HR=0.57,P=0.023;OS HR=0.48,P=0.019)。PSM后,噻替哌-ASCT生存优于CAR-T(PFS HR=0.45,P=0.005;OS HR=0.41,P=0.014)。数据支持符合条件患者接受噻替哌-ASCT,尤其是初诊疾病和单纯CNS复发患者。单纯CNS复发较少伴随全身复发,支持借鉴原发性CNS淋巴瘤方案治疗。
Secondary central nervous system (CNS) large B-cell lymphoma (SCNSL) occurs in the de novo setting, as a CNS-isolated relapse, or synchronous (concomitant CNS and systemic) relapse. SCNSL is a devastating event without therapeutic consensus. Thus, we aimed to evaluate treatment outcomes in an international cohort. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR, estimated using competing-risk models) were reported. Prognostic factors were identified in a 6-month landmark multivariate analysis. Outcomes after thiotepa autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy (CAR-T) delivered at relapse were compared after propensity score matching (PSM). A total of 1139 patients were included in the analysis (de novo: 537; relapsed SCNSL: 602). Two-year PFS estimates were 40.4%, 43.9%, and 16.2% for de novo SCNSL, CNS-isolated relapse, and synchronous relapse, respectively. Patients with CNS-isolated relapse demonstrated low rates of systemic recurrence (24-month CIR, 6%). Thiotepa-ASCT correlated with longer survival in de novo SCNSL (PFS: hazard ratio [HR], 0.57; P = .005; and OS: HR, 0.62; P = .023) and CNS-isolated relapses (PFS: HR, 0.55; P = .002; and OS: HR, 0.39; P< .0001). ASCT (thiotepa or no thiotepa) also associated with improved survival in synchronous relapses (PFS: HR, 0.57; P = .023; and OS: HR, 0.48; P = .019). Higher survival with thiotepa-ASCT than CAR-T was observed after PSM (PFS: HR, 0.45; P = .005 and OS: HR, 0.41; P = .014). These data support thiotepa-ASCT in eligible patients, particularly de novo disease and CNS-isolated relapses. CNS-isolated relapse was infrequently associated with systemic recurrence, supporting treatment regimens adopted from primary CNS lymphoma.
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。