← 返回前沿论文

大 B 细胞淋巴瘤继发中枢神经系统受累的治疗相关结局与复发模式

英文原题:Treatment-related outcomes and patterns of relapse in secondary CNS involvement by large B-cell lymphoma.

查看英文原题

Treatment-related outcomes and patterns of relapse in secondary CNS involvement by large B-cell lymphoma.

PubMed 2026/04/16(内容时间) Blood Q1 · IF 23.9(JCR 2025)

研究概要

这些数据支持在符合条件的患者中采用 thiotepa-ASCT,尤其是新发疾病和中枢神经系统孤立性复发患者。

中文摘要

大B细胞淋巴瘤继发中枢神经系统(CNS)受累(SCNSL)可在初诊时出现、表现为单纯CNS复发,或表现为CNS与全身同步复发。SCNSL后果严重,目前尚无治疗共识,因此本研究评估国际队列中的治疗结局。研究报告无进展生存期(PFS)、总生存期(OS)和采用竞争风险模型估算的复发累积发生率(CIR),并通过6个月界标多变量分析识别预后因素。采用倾向评分匹配(PSM)比较复发时接受噻替哌预处理自体干细胞移植(ASCT)与嵌合抗原受体(CAR)T细胞治疗的结局。分析共纳入1,139例患者(初诊SCNSL 537例;复发SCNSL 602例)。初诊SCNSL、单纯CNS复发及同步复发的2年PFS估计值分别为40.4%、43.9%和16.2%。单纯CNS复发患者全身复发率较低(24个月CIR为6%)。噻替哌-ASCT与初诊SCNSL患者更长生存相关(PFS HR=0.57,P=0.005;OS HR=0.62,P=0.023),也与单纯CNS复发患者更长生存相关(PFS HR=0.55,P=0.002;OS HR=0.39,P<0.0001)。ASCT(无论是否采用噻替哌)也与同步复发患者生存改善相关(PFS HR=0.57,P=0.023;OS HR=0.48,P=0.019)。PSM后,噻替哌-ASCT生存优于CAR-T(PFS HR=0.45,P=0.005;OS HR=0.41,P=0.014)。数据支持符合条件患者接受噻替哌-ASCT,尤其是初诊疾病和单纯CNS复发患者。单纯CNS复发较少伴随全身复发,支持借鉴原发性CNS淋巴瘤方案治疗。

展开英文摘要原文

Secondary central nervous system (CNS) large B-cell lymphoma (SCNSL) occurs in the de novo setting, as a CNS-isolated relapse, or synchronous (concomitant CNS and systemic) relapse. SCNSL is a devastating event without therapeutic consensus. Thus, we aimed to evaluate treatment outcomes in an international cohort. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR, estimated using competing-risk models) were reported. Prognostic factors were identified in a 6-month landmark multivariate analysis. Outcomes after thiotepa autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy (CAR-T) delivered at relapse were compared after propensity score matching (PSM). A total of 1139 patients were included in the analysis (de novo: 537; relapsed SCNSL: 602). Two-year PFS estimates were 40.4%, 43.9%, and 16.2% for de novo SCNSL, CNS-isolated relapse, and synchronous relapse, respectively. Patients with CNS-isolated relapse demonstrated low rates of systemic recurrence (24-month CIR, 6%). Thiotepa-ASCT correlated with longer survival in de novo SCNSL (PFS: hazard ratio [HR], 0.57; P = .005; and OS: HR, 0.62; P = .023) and CNS-isolated relapses (PFS: HR, 0.55; P = .002; and OS: HR, 0.39; P< .0001). ASCT (thiotepa or no thiotepa) also associated with improved survival in synchronous relapses (PFS: HR, 0.57; P = .023; and OS: HR, 0.48; P = .019). Higher survival with thiotepa-ASCT than CAR-T was observed after PSM (PFS: HR, 0.45; P = .005 and OS: HR, 0.41; P = .014). These data support thiotepa-ASCT in eligible patients, particularly de novo disease and CNS-isolated relapses. CNS-isolated relapse was infrequently associated with systemic recurrence, supporting treatment regimens adopted from primary CNS lymphoma.

论文信息

作者
Alderuccio JP、Baggio D、Han S、Ghione P、Nizamuddin I、Khwaja J、Saha A、Dong N
第一作者单位
Division of Hematology, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center University of Miami, Miami, FL.
通讯作者单位
Department of Haematology, University College London Hospital, London, United Kingdom.United Kingdom
期刊
Blood2026 Apr 16
原文标识
PubMed 41490516 · DOI 10.1182/blood.2025031455