← 返回前沿论文

allo-HSCT 后复发的弥漫大 B 细胞淋巴瘤患者的序贯伪异基因 CAR20/22/19 T 细胞治疗:病例报告

英文原题:Sequential pseudoallogeneic CAR20/22/19 T-cell therapy in patient with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma relapse after allo-HSCT: a case report.

PubMed 2025/12/05(内容时间) Front Immunol Q1 · IF 7(JCR 2025)

研究概要

我们的研究结果表明,假同种异体 CAR-T 疗法对 allo-HSCT 后复发的 DLBCL 患者安全有效。序贯给予 CAR20/22/19 T 细胞可能降低了 DLBCL 中的抗原逃逸复发。对于 allo-HSCT 后复发的 DLBCL 患者,需要更大规模的试验来验证假同种异体 CAR-T 疗法的安全性和有效性,以及其降低抗原逃逸复发率的能力。

研究思路结论见上方概要

难治/复发性弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤(R/R DLBCL)患者的预后极差。R/R DLBCL的复发主要由抗原丢失或突变以及嵌合抗原受体(CAR)T细胞在体内存活时间有限所决定。

一名38岁女性患者于2018年3月被诊断为左侧乳腺DLBCL。在接受免疫化疗、自体干细胞移植和放疗后,她于2019年5月复发。外周血(PB)形态学显示36%的细胞被归类为未知。骨髓(BM)涂片显示71%的异常淋巴细胞。BM流式细胞术(FCM)分析显示70.24%的成熟B淋巴细胞异常表型。患者的异常核型复杂,且第17号染色体缺失。荧光原位杂交(FISH)检查显示p53基因缺失(约占82%)。

自体CD19 CAR T细胞在环磷酰胺和氟达拉滨清淋化疗后回输。患者发生I级细胞因子释放综合征(CRS),并获得完全缓解(CR)。遗传易感基因检测结果提示患者存在血液肿瘤潜在易感基因突变;因此,进行异基因造血干细胞移植(allo-HSCT)作为巩固治疗。不幸的是,患者在allo-HSCT后5个月复发。随后,患者接受了序贯伪异基因CAR20/22/19 T细胞治疗。患者目前在allo-CAR-T治疗后4年,BM形态学CR,微小残留病阴性,完全供者嵌合,且无移植物抗宿主病(GVHD)。

展开英文摘要原文

PURPOSE: The prognosis for patients with refractory/relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (R/R DLBCL) is dismal. Recurrence in R/R DLBCL is mostly determined by antigen loss or mutation and the limited in vivo survival of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells. METHODS: A 38-year-old female patient was diagnosed with left breast DLBCL in March 2018. After undergoing immunochemotherapy, autologous stem cell transplantation, and radiotherapy, she relapsed in May 2019. The peripheral blood (PB) morphology showed that 36% of cells were classified as unknown. The bone marrow (BM) smear showed 71% of abnormal lymphocytes. BM flow cytometric (FCM) analysis revealed 70.24% abnormal phenotype of mature B lymphocytes. The patient's abnormal karyotype was complex, and the 17th chromosome was missing. The p53 gene deletion (which accounted for approximately 82%) was revealed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) investigation. RESULTS: Autologous CD19 CAR T cells were infused after lymphodepletion chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide and fludarabine. The patient experienced Grade I cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and achieved complete remission (CR). The genetic susceptibility gene test results suggested that the patient had potential susceptibility gene mutations for hematological tumors; therefore, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) was conducted as consolidation therapy. Unfortunately, the patient relapsed 5 months after allo-HSCT. Then, the patient received sequential pseudoallogeneic CAR20/22/19 T-cell therapy. The patient is currently at 4 years after allo-CAR-T treatment with BM morphology CR, negative minimal residual disease, complete donor chimerism, and no graft versus host disease (GVHD). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that pseudoallogeneic CAR-T therapy was safe and effective in patients with DLBCL who experienced relapse after allo-HSCT. Sequential administration of CAR20/22/19 T cells may have reduced the antigen escape relapse in DLBCL. For patients with DLBCL relapse after allo-HSCT, larger trials are required to validate the safety and effectiveness of pseudoallogeneic CAR-T therapy as well as its ability to lower the rate of antigen escape relapse.

论文信息

作者
Xiong Y、Feng S、Liu W、Zheng Q、Deng B、Li Z、Zhao D
第一作者单位
Department of Radiation and Medical Oncology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.China
通讯作者单位
Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, Beijing GoBroad Boren Hospital, Beijing, China.China
文献类型
病例报告
期刊
Frontiers in immunology2025
原文标识
PubMed 41425542 · DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1687478