决定异体 CAR T 细胞排斥与扩增的细胞和分子机制
Cellular and molecular mechanisms determining allogeneic CAR T cell rejection and expansion.
我们评估了11例接受单一批次cemacabtagene ansegedleucel(cema-cel)治疗的大B细胞淋巴瘤患者,cemacabtagene ansegedleucel是一种异体抗CD19 CAR T产品。
英文原题:Immune cell senescence drives responsiveness to immunotherapy in melanoma.
我们的研究结果提供了证据,表明肿瘤微环境中免疫细胞区室内的细胞衰老是免疫治疗反应的一个强效决定因素,并为靶向该过程的策略铺平了道路,这些策略有望改善此类干预措施的结局。
免疫治疗显著改善了癌症治疗。然而,它并非对所有癌症患者都有效,因此需要在分子和细胞水平上进一步阐明应答者与无应答者之间的差异。对免疫治疗无应答被归因于功能失调的免疫细胞状态,如T细胞耗竭和免疫失能,而细胞衰老的作用仍不明确。在此,我们在将免疫检查点抑制剂作为一线治疗的黑色素瘤中,研究了免疫细胞衰老在检查点抑制剂应答中的作用。
我们开展了一项病例对照研究,采用了两种互补的衰老检测方法。首先,我们在接受免疫治疗的黑色素瘤患者的单细胞 RNA-seq 数据集中,回顾性应用了我们开发的衰老分子特征,称为“SeneVick”。在此分析之前,该特征已在多种细胞/组织背景、衰老类型和物种中进行了广泛验证。其次,我们通过一种已建立的实验算法方法,在类似黑色素瘤临床队列的循环免疫细胞中评估了细胞衰老。
黑色素瘤患者中对免疫治疗无应答者,其CD8+ T细胞、CD4+ T细胞、B细胞(CD19+/CD20+)和NK细胞区室中的细胞衰老程度较应答者增加。这一现象与患者的临床特征(年龄、性别、黑色素瘤类型、分期)无关,且不同于传统抗癌治疗,并非免疫治疗的结果。有趣的是,与应答者相比,无应答者免疫亚群之间的细胞间相互作用发生了改变,这与细胞毒性试验一起支持了衰老免疫细胞表现出免疫抑制特性,从而驱动免疫应答缺陷和治疗失败。
BACKGROUND: Immunotherapy has significantly improved cancer treatment. However, it is not effective in all cancer patients, rendering the need to further delineate the differences among responders and non-responders at the molecular and cellular level. Unresponsiveness to immunotherapy has been attributed to dysfunctional immune cell states such as T-cell exhaustion and anergy, whereas the contribution of cellular senescence remains elusive. Herein, we have investigated the role of immune cell senescence in the response to checkpoint inhibitors in melanomas where these immunotherapies are applied as a first line treatment. METHODS: Two senescence detecting complementary approaches were utilized in a case control study we conducted. First, we implemented a senescence molecular signature we developed, termed "SeneVick", retrospectively in a single cell RNA-seq dataset from melanoma patients who received immunotherapy. Prior to this analysis, the signature was extensively validated in a variety of cell/tissue contexts, senescence types and species. Second, cellular senescence was assessed via an established experimental algorithmic approach in circulating immune cells of an analogous melanoma clinical cohort. RESULTS: Melanoma patients who did not respond to immunotherapy exhibited increased cellular senescence in the CD8 + T-cell, CD4 + T-cell, B-cell (CD19 + /CD20 +) and NK cell compartments compared to responders. This phenomenon was independent of patients' clinical features (age, sex, melanoma type, stage) and not an outcome of immunotherapy, in contrast to conventional anti-cancer treatments. Interestingly, alterations of cell-to-cell interactions among the immune sub-populations in non-responders compared to responders were identified, supporting, along with cytotoxicity assays, that senescent immune cells display immunosuppressive properties driving defective immune responses and treatment failure. CONCLUSION: Overall, our findings provide evidence that cellular senescence within the immune cell compartment of the tumor micro-environment is a potent determinant of the response to immunotherapy and pave the way for strategies targeting it as promising approaches to improve the outcome of such interventions.
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。