不适合移植的大 B 细胞淋巴瘤二线使用 axicabtagene ciloleucel:ALYCANTE 最终分析
Second-line axicabtagene ciloleucel in large B-cell lymphoma ineligible for transplantation: ALYCANTE final analysis.
英文原题:Prognostic factors and outcomes of tisagenlecleucel in relapsed or refractory B-cell malignancies: a single-center real-world study.
Prognostic factors and outcomes of tisagenlecleucel in relapsed or refractory B-cell malignancies: a single-center real-world study.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
Tisa-cel 治疗在韩国 R/R B 细胞恶性肿瘤患者中可行且有效。单核细胞负荷和采集产物中 CD3+ T 细胞质量等治疗前免疫参数显著影响 DLBCL 的结局。这些发现提示,优化患者选择和改进生产策略可能增强 CAR-T 疗效,尤其是在资源受限或异质性较大的真实世界环境中。
Tisagenlecleucel(tisa-cel)是一种靶向CD19的CAR-T 细胞疗法,已被批准用于治疗复发/难治性(R/R)弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)和B细胞前体急性淋巴细胞白血病(B-ALL)。尽管关键性试验已证实其疗效,但来自亚洲人群的真实世界证据仍然匮乏。尤其是,韩国患者中关于生产可行性、临床结局和预测性生物标志物的数据有限。
本研究旨在评估tisa-cel疗法在韩国R/R DLBCL和B-ALL患者中的临床结局及预后因素,特别关注单采产品品质和基线免疫标志物。
开展了一项单中心回顾性研究,纳入2022年4月至2024年4月期间计划接受tisa-cel的91例患者(DLBCL=72;B-ALL=19)。分析了白细胞分离术数据、治疗反应、生存结局和毒性特征。意向治疗(ITT)队列从白细胞分离术时开始定义。采用Cox回归确定生存和复发的预测因素,并分别对DLBCL和B-ALL进行分析。
在91例患者中,72例接受了tisa-cel输注。整个ITT队列的1年总生存期(OS)和无病生存期(DFS)分别为45.9%和37.5%。在19例接受tisa-cel输注后的B-ALL中,1年OS和DFS分别为68.4%和52.6%,无NRM。在53例接受tisa-cel输注后的DLBCL中,1年OS和DFS分别为46.8%和41.6%,缓解者中累积复发发生率为29.6%。NRM为9.5%,主要见于老年患者。在DLBCL亚组中,较差的OS独立与三线或更晚线挽救治疗(风险比[HR] 2.39)、单采时外周血单核细胞比例高(>10%,HR 2.57)、单采产物中CD3+ T细胞浓度低(<1.0 10 /mL,HR 4.31)以及发生免疫效应细胞相关神经毒性综合征(HR 2.47)相关。B-ALL患者表现出良好的生存和较低的毒性,但未发现显著的预后标志物。
Tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel), a CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy, is an approved treatment for relapsed or refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). While pivotal trials demonstrated its efficacy, real-world evidence from Asian populations remains scarce. In particular, data on manufacturing feasibility, clinical outcomes, and predictive biomarkers in Korean patients are limited.
This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes and prognostic factors of tisa-cel therapy in Korean patients with R/R DLBCL and B-ALL, with a specific focus on apheresis product quality and baseline immune markers. STUDY DESIGN: A single-center retrospective study was conducted including 91 patients (DLBCL = 72; B-ALL = 19) intended to receive tisa-cel between April 2022 and April 2024. Apheresis data, treatment responses, survival outcomes, and toxicity profiles were analyzed. The intention-to-treat (ITT) cohort was defined from the time of apheresis. Cox regression was used to identify predictors of survival and relapse, and separate analyses were performed for DLBCL and B-ALL.
Out of 91 patients, 72 received tisa-cel infusion. One-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) for the entire ITT cohort were 45.9% and 37.5%, respectively. In 19 B-ALL after tisa-cel infusion, 1-year OS and DFS were 68.4% and 52.6%, with no non-relapse mortality (NRM). In 53 DLBCL after tisa-cel infusion, 1-year OS and DFS were 46.8% and 41.6%, respectively, with 29.6% cumulative incidence of relapse among responders. NRM was 9.5% mostly observed in elderly patients. In the DLBCL subgroup, poor OS was independently associated with third-or-later-line salvage therapy (hazard ratio [HR] 2.39), high peripheral blood monocyte proportion at apheresis (>10%, HR 2.57), low CD3+ T-cell concentration in apheresis product (<1.0 10 /mL, HR 4.31), and occurrence of immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (HR 2.47). B-ALL patients demonstrated favorable survival and lower toxicity, but no significant prognostic markers were identified.
Tisa-cel therapy was feasible and effective in Korean patients with R/R B-cell malignancies. Pre-treatment immune parameters such as monocyte burden and CD3+ T-cell quality in apheresis products significantly influenced outcomes in DLBCL. These findings suggest that optimizing patient selection and refining manufacturing strategies may enhance CAR-T efficacy, particularly in resource-constrained or heterogeneous real-world settings.
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。