← 返回前沿论文

多发性骨髓瘤中 BCMA 和 GPRC5D 靶向免疫治疗的序贯:来自欧洲骨髓瘤网络的实践指南

英文原题:Sequencing BCMA- and GPRC5D-targeting immunotherapies in multiple myeloma: Practical guidance from the European Myeloma Network.

PubMed 2025/11/25(内容时间) Hemasphere Q1 · IF 11.3(JCR 2025)

研究概要

近年来,随着针对BCMA和GPRC5D的新型免疫疗法的引入,包括CAR T细胞疗法、双特异性抗体(BsAbs)和抗体-药物偶联物,经过多线治疗的复发/难治性MM的治疗格局已发生显著变化。

中文摘要

近年来,随着针对BCMA和GPRC5D的新型免疫疗法的引入,包括CAR T细胞疗法、双特异性抗体(BsAbs)和抗体药物偶联物(ADCs),重度经治复发/难治性MM的治疗格局已发生显著变化。随着治疗选择范围的扩大,治疗选择和排序变得日益复杂。在本综述中,欧洲骨髓瘤网络基于当前证据,就如何最好地将这些新型疗法纳入现有治疗格局提供了建议。最佳治疗顺序取决于多种患者和肿瘤相关特征,但也取决于报销和可及性问题。此外,复发机制(如抗原丢失、T细胞适应性降低或T细胞耐药克隆的生长)决定了序贯BCMA或GPRC5D靶向免疫疗法的疗效。靶向BCMA的BsAbs和ADCs最好应在CAR T细胞疗法之前避免使用,因为一些研究表明这些药物会对CAR T细胞疗法后的临床结局产生负面影响。因此,我们建议首先选择CAR T细胞疗法,如果患者适合接受CAR T细胞疗法且CAR T细胞疗法可在短时间内获得,则在疾病进程中较晚阶段使用BsAbs和/或belamaf。然而,可考虑使用靶向GPRC5D的BsAbs进行桥接治疗(在单采后开始),以显著降低肿瘤负荷,因为已证明这可改善后续BCMA靶向CAR T细胞疗法的疗效。使用靶向同一抗原但作用机制不同的药物进行序贯治疗是可行的,但多项研究表明靶点转换是更有效的策略。此外,越来越多的证据表明,通过设置无BsAb间期,可提高BsAb序贯使用的疗效。

展开英文摘要原文

The treatment landscape of heavily pretreated relapsed/refractory MM has changed considerably in recent years with the introduction of novel BCMA- and GPRC5D-directed immunotherapies, including CAR T-cell therapy, bispecific antibodies (BsAbs), and antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs). Treatment selection and sequencing become increasingly complex with the broad range of therapeutic options. In this review, the European Myeloma Network provides recommendations on how to best incorporate these novel therapies into the present treatment landscape using current evidence. The optimal treatment sequence depends on various patient- and tumor-related features, but also reimbursement and availability issues. In addition, mechanisms underlying relapse (e.g., antigen loss, reduced T-cell fitness, or outgrowth of T-cell resistant clones) dictate the efficacy of sequential BCMA- or GPRC5D-directed immunotherapy. BCMA-targeting BsAbs and ADCs should preferably be avoided prior to CAR T-cell therapy, as some studies have shown that these agents negatively influence clinical outcomes after CAR T-cell therapy. Therefore, we recommend the selection of CAR T-cell therapy first, and BsAbs and/or belamaf later in the disease course, if patients are eligible for CAR T-cell therapy and in case CAR T-cell therapy is available within a short time frame. However, bridging therapy with GPRC5D-directed BsAbs (initiation after apheresis) can be considered to significantly reduce tumor burden, because this was shown to improve the efficacy of consecutive BCMA-directed CAR T-cell therapy. Sequential treatment with agents targeting the same antigen, but with different modes of action, is feasible, but several studies have demonstrated that target switch is a more effective strategy. In addition, there is increasing evidence indicating that the efficacy of sequential use of BsAbs can be improved by creating a BsAb-free interval.

论文信息

作者
van de Donk NWCJ、Moreau P、San-Miguel JF、Mateos MV、Dimopoulos MA、Zweegman S、Gay F、Engelhardt M
第一作者单位
Department of Hematology, Amsterdam UMC Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands.Netherlands
通讯作者单位
Department of Internal Medicine II University Hospital of Würzburg Würzburg Germany.Germany
期刊
HemaSphere2025 Nov
原文标识
PubMed 41306326 · DOI 10.1002/hem3.70260