← 返回前沿论文

基于抗体、T 细胞受体和适配体的双特异性免疫治疗:作用机制、不良反应与未来展望

英文原题:Bispecific immunotherapy based on antibodies, T-cell receptors, and aptamers: mechanisms of action, adverse effects, and future perspectives.

查看英文原题

Bispecific immunotherapy based on antibodies, T-cell receptors, and aptamers: mechanisms of action, adverse effects, and future perspectives.

PubMed 2025/11/04(内容时间) Front Immunol Q1 · IF 7(JCR 2025)

研究概要

在过去十年中,双特异性免疫治疗平台已从实验室原型进展到多中心临床试验,开启了精准肿瘤学的新轨迹。

中文摘要

过去十年间,双特异性免疫治疗平台已从实验室原型发展至多中心临床试验,开启了精准肿瘤学的新篇章。本综述综合了针对三类主要双特异性分子的原始研究,涵盖其设计原理、作用机制、治疗效果及局限性:(i) IgG样抗体,(ii) 修饰的T细胞受体构建体(TCR样及ImmTAC),以及(iii) 双特异性适配体。IgG格式——包括blinatumomab、teclistamab、mosunetuzumab和tarlatamab——在血液恶性肿瘤中实现了高客观缓解率,并逐渐在实体瘤中展现出临床活性。TCR构建体通过识别MHC分子上呈递的胞内抗原,拓宽了可作用靶点的范围,tebentafusp获批用于葡萄膜黑色素瘤即为范例。适配体分子具有极低免疫原性、快速组织穿透能力,并作为治疗载荷载体展现出巨大潜力。我们深入分析了T细胞和NK细胞重定向、免疫检查点阻断及直接抑制致癌受体过程中激活的信号级联反应。对已完成及进行中的临床研究的比较评估,凸显了双特异性平台相关的反复出现的挑战和不良事件,包括细胞因子释放综合征、神经毒性、抗原漂移、对致密纤维化实体瘤的有限浸润,以及抗药物抗体的产生。正在开发中的工程解决方案包括蛋白酶可激活的“掩蔽”构建体、逐步递增给药方案、细胞外基质的酶促重塑,以及通过溶瘤病毒或腺相关病毒载体局部表达衔接分子。特别强调联合策略,即双特异性药物与CAR-T或γδ T细胞、PD-(L)1抑制剂或溶瘤病毒配对使用,从而增强效应细胞浸润并抑制耐药性。综合证据表明,双特异性免疫治疗的持续进展将依赖于预测性分子生物标志物的整合、对抗原景观动态演变的监测,以及生物制造过程的标准化。这些进展有望加速下一代多功能双特异性构建体的临床部署。

展开英文摘要原文

Over the past decade, bispecific immunotherapeutic platforms have progressed from laboratory prototypes to multicenter clinical trials, inaugurating a new trajectory for precision oncology. This review synthesizes original studies that address the design principles, mechanisms of action, therapeutic efficacy, and limitations of three principal classes of bispecific molecules: (i) IgG-like antibodies, (ii) modified T-cell-receptor-based constructs (TCR-like and ImmTAC), and (iii) bispecific aptamers. IgG formats-including blinatumomab, teclistamab, mosunetuzumab, and tarlatamab-achieve high objective-response rates in hematologic malignancies and are increasingly demonstrating clinical activity in solid tumors. TCR-based constructs broaden the repertoire of actionable targets by recognizing intracellular antigens presented on MHC molecules, as exemplified by the approval of tebentafusp for uveal melanoma. Aptameric molecules exhibit minimal immunogenicity, rapid tissue penetration, and considerable promise as carriers for therapeutic payloads. We provide an in-depth analysis of the signaling cascades activated during T- and NK-cell redirection, immune checkpoint blockade, and direct inhibition of oncogenic receptors. Comparative evaluation of completed and ongoing clinical studies highlights recurring challenges and adverse events associated with bispecific platforms, including cytokine-release syndrome, neurotoxicity, antigenic drift, limited infiltration of densely fibrotic solid tumors, and the emergence of anti-drug antibodies. Engineering solutions under development encompass protease-activatable "masked" constructs, step-up dosing regimens, enzymatic remodeling of the extracellular matrix, and local expression of engager molecules via oncolytic viruses or adeno-associated viral vectors. Special emphasis is placed on combinatorial strategies in which bispecific agents are paired with CAR-T or -T cells, PD-(L)1 inhibitors, or oncolytic viruses, thereby enhancing effector-cell infiltration and curtailing resistance. The integrated evidence indicates that continued progress in bispecific immunotherapy will depend on the incorporation of predictive molecular biomarkers, dynamic monitoring of the evolving antigenic landscape, and the standardization of biomanufacturing processes. These advances are expected to accelerate the clinical deployment of next-generation, multipurpose bispecific constructs.

论文信息

作者
Lopatnikova JA、Sennikov SV
单位
Laboratory of Molecular Immunology, Research Institute of Fundamental and Clinical Immunology, Novosibirsk, Russia.Russia
文献类型
综述
期刊
Frontiers in immunology2025
原文标识
PubMed 41262250 · DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1679092