← 返回前沿论文

异体 CAR 工程化细胞治疗复发和难治性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤:系统综述与荟萃分析

英文原题:Allogeneic CAR-engineered cellular therapy for relapsed and refractory large B cell lymphoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PubMed 2025/07/08(内容时间) Front Immunol Q1 · IF 7(JCR 2025)

研究概要

异体CAR-T和CAR-NK细胞疗法在重度经治的r/r LBCL患者中显示出令人鼓舞的疗效。结合其良好的安全性特征以及现货供应的潜力,异体细胞疗法有望扩大活细胞治疗的可及范围,在未来数年为更广泛的患者群体带来有影响力的结果。

研究思路结论见上方概要

复发/难治性(r/r)大B细胞淋巴瘤(LBCL)仍是一种难以治疗的疾病,治疗选择有限,临床需求高度未满足,亟需开发更有效且适用性更广的新疗法。尽管自体嵌合抗原受体(CAR)-T细胞疗法已改变了治疗格局,但接受这些疗法的患者中仍有60-65%最终复发,凸显了改进方法的必要性。异体CAR-T和CAR-NK细胞疗法近期作为有前景的替代方案出现,具有缩短生产时间、降低成本以及扩大更广泛患者群体可及性的潜力。本系统综述和meta分析汇总了目前可获得的关于这些新疗法在成人r/r LBCL患者中疗效和安全性的临床试验数据。

对截至2025年1月12日发表的、涉及异体CAR-T和CAR-NK细胞疗法治疗R/R LBCL的研究,系统检索了MEDLINE、EMBASE、Web of Science和Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials。评估的主要结局为任意时间点的最佳总缓解率(bORR)和最佳完全缓解率(bCRR)。次要结局包括1-2级和3级及以上细胞因子释放综合征(CRS)的发生率、1-2级和3级及以上免疫效应细胞相关神经毒性综合征(ICANS)的发生率、1-2级和3级及以上感染的发生率以及移植物抗宿主病(GvHD)的发生率。

19项研究符合纳入和排除标准,涵盖334例可评估安全性的患者(155例CAR-NK;179例CAR-T)和235例可评估反应的患者(77例CAR-NK;158例CAR-T)。最佳总缓解率(bORR)和最佳完全缓解率(bCRR)的汇总估计分别为52.5% [95% CI, 41.0-63.9]和32.8% [95% CI, 24.2-42.0]。安全性分析显示,3级及以上CRS(0.04% [95% CI 0.00-0.49])或3级及以上ICANS(0.64% [95% CI 0.01-2.23])的发生率极低,且在纳入研究的334例输注患者中仅发生1例类GvH反应,凸显了CAR工程化“现货型”异体方法卓越的安全性特征。低级别CRS的估计总发生率为30% [95% CI, 14-48],而低级别ICANS的估计总发生率为1% [95% CI, 0%-4%],显著低于当前一代自体CAR-T细胞产品。低级别感染和严重感染的发生率分别为25% [95% CI 14-36%](n=252)和7% [95% CI 2-14%](n=291)。

展开英文摘要原文

INTRODUCTION: Relapsed/refractory (r/r) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) remains a difficult-to-treat disease with limited treatment options and high unmet clinical need, necessitating the development of new therapies with greater potency and broader applicability. While autologous chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapies have transformed the treatment landscape, 60-65% of patients receiving these therapies eventually relapse, underscoring the need for improved approaches. Allogeneic CAR-T and CAR-NK cell therapies have recently emerged as promising alternatives, offering the potential to shorten manufacturing times, reduce costs, and expand access to a broader patient population. This systematic review and meta-analysis compiles the currently available clinical trial data on the efficacy and safety of these novel therapies in adult patients with r/r LBCL. METHODS: A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was conducted for studies published up to January 12, 2025, involving allogeneic CAR-T and CAR-NK cell therapies in R/R LBCL. The primary outcomes assessed were the best overall response rate (bORR) and best complete response rate (bCRR) at any time point. Secondary outcomes included rates of grade 1-2 and grade 3+ cytokine release syndrome (CRS), grade 1-2 and grade 3+ immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), grade 1-2 and grade 3+ infections and incidence of graft-versus-host disease (GvHD). RESULTS: Nineteen studies met the inclusion and exclusion criteria, encompassing 334 patients (155 CAR-NK; 179 CAR-T) evaluable for safety and 235 patients evaluable for response (77 CAR-NK; 158 CAR-T). The pooled estimates for the best overall response rate (bORR) and the best complete response rate (bCRR) were 52.5% [95% CI, 41.0-63.9] and 32.8% [95% CI, 24.2-42.0], respectively. Safety analysis revealed very low incidences of grade 3+ CRS (0.04% [95% CI 0.00-0.49]) or grade 3+ ICANS (0.64% [95% CI 0.01-2.23]) and only one occurrence of a GvH-like reaction across 334 infused patients enrolled in the included studies, highlighting the remarkable safety profile of CAR-engineered "off-the-shelf" allogeneic approaches. The estimated overall incidence of low-grade CRS was 30% [95% CI, 14-48], while the estimated overall incidence of low-grade ICANS was 1% [95% CI, 0%-4%], markedly lower than current-generation autologous CAR-T cell products. The incidence of low-grade and severe infections was 25% [95% CI 14-36%) (n=252) and 7% [95% CI 2-14%] (n=291), respectively. DISCUSSION: Together, allogeneic CAR-T and CAR-NK cell therapies demonstrate encouraging efficacy in heavily pretreated patients with r/r LBCL. Coupled with their favorable safety profiles and the potential for off-the-shelf availability, allogeneic cell therapies hold great promise to broaden the reach of live cell-based treatments, delivering impactful results to a wider patient population in the coming years.

论文信息

作者
Biederstädt A、Bassermann F、Hecker JS
单位
Department of Medicine III, Technical University of Munich (TUM), School of Medicine and Health, Munich, Germany.Germany
文献类型
系统综述 · 荟萃分析
期刊
Frontiers in immunology2025
原文标识
PubMed 40698082 · DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1585556