决定异体 CAR T 细胞排斥与扩增的细胞和分子机制
Cellular and molecular mechanisms determining allogeneic CAR T cell rejection and expansion.
我们评估了11例接受单一批次cemacabtagene ansegedleucel(cema-cel)治疗的大B细胞淋巴瘤患者,cemacabtagene ansegedleucel是一种异体抗CD19 CAR T产品。
英文原题:TIGIT blockade in the context of BCMA-CART cell therapy does not augment efficacy in a multiple myeloma mouse model.
有趣的是,当小鼠接受第二次肿瘤细胞输注攻击以模拟复发模型时,观察到ARITIGIT组有生存改善的趋势(p = 0.11)。
靶向BCMA的CAR-T疗法在多发性骨髓瘤(MM)中已显示出有希望的结果。然而,患者仍会复发。T细胞耗竭伴TIGIT表达增加是一种耐药机制,这在我们机构开发的学术性CAR-T——ARI0002h试验的CAR-T细胞中得到了证实。我们旨在分析阻断TIGIT对ARI0002h疗效的影响。我们采用了三种不同的策略来阻断TIGIT:(1)添加外部阻断性抗TIGIT抗体(Ab),(2)将ARI0002h改造为第四代CAR-T,命名为ARITIGIT,能够分泌可溶性TIGIT阻断scFv,以及(3)使用CRISPR/Cas9在ARI0002h中进行TIGIT敲除。每种策略均在体外和体内进行了评估。向ARI0002h中添加TIGIT阻断抗体改善了体外细胞毒性,但未能提高小鼠生存率。新的第四代CAR-T——ARITIGIT,尽管通过使用高表达TIGIT配体PVR的骨髓瘤细胞系有利于体内模型,但也未能实现更好的生存结果。有趣的是,当小鼠接受第二次肿瘤细胞输注攻击时,模拟复发模型,观察到ARITIGIT有改善生存的趋势(p = 0.11)。最后,使用CRISPR/Cas9在ARI0002h上进行TIGIT敲除(KO-ARI0002h)显示出与ARI0002h相似的体外活性。在体内应激模型中,TIGIT KO-ARI0002h延长了生存期(p = 0.02)。然而,与ARI0002h相比,这种改善并不显著(p = 0.07)。尽管使用了三种不同的方法,本研究未能证明TIGIT阻断对ARI0002h细胞有显著益处,提示靶向单一免疫检查点可能不足。
BCMA-directed CAR-T therapies have shown promising results in multiple myeloma (MM). However, patients continue to relapse. T cell exhaustion with increased TIGIT expression is a resistance mechanism which was confirmed in CAR-T cells from ARI0002h trial, an academic CAR-T developed in our institution. We aimed to analyze the impact of blocking TIGIT on the efficacy of ARI0002h. We used three different strategies to block TIGIT: (1) Addition of an external blocking anti-TIGIT-antibody (Ab), (2) Modify ARI0002h into a 4 th generation CAR-T, named ARITIGIT, capable of secreting a soluble TIGIT-blocking scFv and (3) TIGIT knock-out in ARI0002h using CRISPR/Cas9. Each strategy was evaluated in vitro and in vivo . Adding a TIGIT-blocking Ab to ARI0002h improved in vitro cytotoxicity, but failed to enhance mice survival. The new 4 th generation CAR-T, ARITIGIT, was also unable to achieve better survival outcomes despite favoring the in vivo model by using a myeloma cell line with high expression of the TIGIT ligand PVR. Interestingly, when mice were challenged with a second infusion of tumor cells, mimicking a relapse model, a trend for improved survival with ARITIGIT was observed ( p = 0.11). Finally, TIGIT-knock-out on ARI0002h (KO-ARI0002h) using CRISPR/Cas9 showed similar in vitro activity to ARI0002h. In an in vivo stress model, TIGIT KO-ARI0002h prolonged survival ( p = 0.02). However, this improvement was not significant compared to ARI0002h ( p = 0.07). This study failed to demonstrate a significant benefit of TIGIT-blockade on ARI0002h cells despite using three different approaches, suggesting that targeting a single immune checkpoint may be insufficient.
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。