决定异体 CAR T 细胞排斥与扩增的细胞和分子机制
Cellular and molecular mechanisms determining allogeneic CAR T cell rejection and expansion.
我们评估了11例接受单一批次cemacabtagene ansegedleucel(cema-cel)治疗的大B细胞淋巴瘤患者,cemacabtagene ansegedleucel是一种异体抗CD19 CAR T产品。
英文原题:Matched donor allogeneic CAR-T for adult B-ALL: toxicity, efficacy, repeat dosing, and the importance of lymphodepletion.
Matched donor allogeneic CAR-T for adult B-ALL: toxicity, efficacy, repeat dosing, and the importance of lymphodepletion.
共17名allo-SCT供者接受了白细胞分离术,14名B-ALL患者(中位年龄43岁)接受了输注。
我们开发了一种同种异体配型供者CD19嵌合抗原受体(CAR)产品(CAR-供者淋巴细胞输注[DLI]),用于异基因干细胞移植(allo-SCT)失败后的成人B细胞急性淋巴细胞白血病(B-ALL)患者。我们评估了CAR-DLI前淋巴细胞清除性化疗(LD)的风险和获益,以及按照常规DLI方案重复CAR-DLI给药的疗效。主要结局是CAR-DLI制备的毒性和可行性;次要结局包括CAR-DLI植入、扩增和持续性。共有17名allo-SCT供者接受了白细胞分离术,14名B-ALL患者(中位年龄43岁)接受了输注。登记时中位疾病负荷为50.5%骨髓原始细胞(范围,可测量残留病[MRD]至100%)。患者1至7仅接受CAR-DLI(单纯CAR-DLI);患者8至14接受CAR-DLI联合氟达拉滨/环磷酰胺LD(CAR-DLI+LD)。与单纯CAR-DLI相比,CAR-DLI+LD与更优的CAR-DLI峰值植入(每g基因组DNA[gDNA] 93 134 vs 8010拷贝)、扩增(每g gDNA每28天858 101 vs 39 038拷贝)和持续性(中位,197 vs 32天)相关。CAR-DLI+LD与单纯CAR-DLI相比未伴有更多免疫毒性,且移植物抗宿主病(GVHD;1级,皮肤)仅影响14名患者中的2名(14%)。与单纯CAR-DLI相比,CAR-DLI+LD在12个月时提供了更优的无事件生存期和总生存期(57% vs 29%;83% vs 29%)。14名患者中有8名(57%)因形态学/MRD+复发接受了重复CAR-DLI给药,但植入/扩增或毒性/疗效均极低。CAR-DLI+LD具有可耐受的安全性特征,无显著GVHD,并与显著优于单纯CAR-DLI的结局相关。在本分析中,未发现第1剂之后的重复CAR-DLI给药有效。本试验在www.clinicaltrials.gov注册,注册号为#NCT02893189。
We developed an allogeneic matched donor CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) product (CAR-donor lymphocyte infusion [DLI]) for adult patients with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) after failure of allogeneic stem-cell transplantation (allo-SCT). We evaluate the risks and benefits of pre-CAR-DLI lymphodepleting chemotherapy (LD) and the efficacy of repeat CAR-DLI dosing per conventional DLI protocols. Primary outcomes were toxicity and feasibility of CAR-DLI manufacture; secondary outcomes included CAR-DLI engraftment, expansion, and persistence. A total of 17 allo-SCT donors received leukapheresis and 14 patients with B-ALL (median age, 43 years) received infusion. Median disease burden at registration was 50.5% bone marrow blasts (range, measurable residual disease [MRD] to 100%). Patients 1 to 7 received CAR-DLI alone (CAR-DLI-alone); patients 8 through 14 received CAR-DLI and LD with fludarabine/cyclophosphamide (CAR-DLI+LD). CAR-DLI+LD vs CAR-DLI-alone was associated with superior peak CAR-DLI engraftment (93 134 vs 8010 copies per g genomic DNA [gDNA]), expansion (858 101 vs 39 038 copies per g gDNA per 28 days) and persistence (median, 197 vs 32 days). CAR-DLI+LD was not associated with more immunotoxicity than CAR-DLI-alone, and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD; grade 1, skin) affected only 2 of 14 patients (14%). CAR-DLI+LD vs CAR-DLI-alone conferred superior event-free-survival and overall survival at 12 months (57% vs 29%; 83% vs 29%). Repeat CAR-DLI dosing was administered to 8 of 14 (57%) patients with morphological/MRD+ relapse, but with minimal engraftment/expansion or toxicity/efficacy. CAR-DLI+LD has a tolerable safety profile without significant GVHD and is associated with significantly better outcomes than CAR-DLI-alone. Repeat CAR-DLI dosing beyond dose 1 was not found to be effective in this analysis. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02893189.
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。