决定异体 CAR T 细胞排斥与扩增的细胞和分子机制
Cellular and molecular mechanisms determining allogeneic CAR T cell rejection and expansion.
我们评估了11例接受单一批次cemacabtagene ansegedleucel(cema-cel)治疗的大B细胞淋巴瘤患者,cemacabtagene ansegedleucel是一种异体抗CD19 CAR T产品。
英文原题:Evaluation of in vivo CAR transgene levels in tisagenlecleucel-treated patients with relapsed/refractory B-ALL and DLBCL.
这些发现提示血液CAR转基因水平可能与长期缓解相关;然而,它们对复发缺乏稳健的预测潜力。
Tisagenlecleucel是一种靶向CD19的自体嵌合抗原受体(CAR)T细胞疗法。定量聚合酶链反应检测通过测量外周血中的CAR转基因,在定义体内动力学方面具有高度敏感性。本研究旨在确定与缓解/复发相关的具有临床意义的CAR T细胞血液水平。在复发/难治性(R/R)B细胞急性淋巴细胞白血病(B-ALL)的儿童/年轻成人患者中,持续完全缓解的患者和CD19-复发患者的最高CAR T细胞血液水平高于CD19+复发患者。在R/R弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)成人患者中,未观察到体内动力学与缓解之间存在明显关联,复发时转基因水平范围广泛。在B-ALL中,B细胞再生障碍持续>6个月的患者相对于早期B细胞恢复(BCR)(输注后<6个月)的患者具有更高的CAR T细胞扩增;然而,无法确定BCR相关扩增水平的明确截断值。在大多数B-ALL患者中,BCR>6个月维持了良好的缓解。然而,由于在推测的复发风险后因移植导致的高删失率,早期BCR无法被确认为复发的潜在指标。然而,这些患者的异基因移植可能潜在减轻与早期BCR相关的不良预后。在DLBCL中,BCR与复发无关。这些发现表明,血液CAR转基因水平可能与长期缓解相关;然而,它们缺乏对复发的稳健预测潜力。如先前报道,用于微小残留病检测的下一代测序似乎是预测B-ALL复发的可靠生物标志物。
Tisagenlecleucel is a CD19-directed autologous chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction assays are highly sensitive in defining in vivo kinetics by measuring CAR transgene in peripheral blood. This study aimed to identify clinically meaningful CAR T-cell blood levels that correlated with response/relapse. In pediatric/young adult patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL), maximum CAR T-cell blood levels were higher in patients with ongoing complete remission and in patients with CD19- relapse relative to those with CD19+ relapse. In adult patients with R/R diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), no apparent association between in vivo kinetics and response was noted, with a wide range of transgene levels at relapse. In B-ALL, patients with B-cell aplasia sustained >6 months had higher CAR T-cell expansion relative to those with early B-cell recovery (BCR) (<6 months after infusion); however, a definitive cutoff for BCR-associated expansion level could not be identified. In most patients with B-ALL, BCR >6 months maintained favorable responses. However, early BCR could not be confirmed as a potential indicator of relapse due to high censoring from transplant, following presumed risk of relapse. However, allografting in these patients may potentially mitigate the poor prognosis related to early BCR. In DLBCL, BCR was not associated with relapse. These findings suggest that blood CAR transgene levels may be associated with long-term responses; however, they lack robust predictive potential for relapses. As reported earlier, next-generation sequencing for minimal residual disease appears to be a reliable biomarker predictive of relapse for B-ALL.
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。