决定异体 CAR T 细胞排斥与扩增的细胞和分子机制
Cellular and molecular mechanisms determining allogeneic CAR T cell rejection and expansion.
我们评估了11例接受单一批次cemacabtagene ansegedleucel(cema-cel)治疗的大B细胞淋巴瘤患者,cemacabtagene ansegedleucel是一种异体抗CD19 CAR T产品。
英文原题:Integrative genomic analysis of DLBCL identifies immune environments associated with bispecific antibody response.
在复发/难治性DLBCL患者中,DLBCL-IQ分型与CD20 CD3 BsAb的临床获益显著相关(N = 74),但与CD19靶向CAR T细胞无关(Stanford,N = 51;Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center,N = 69)。
大多数接受双特异性抗体(BsAbs)或嵌合抗原受体(CAR)T细胞等免疫治疗的弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)患者未能获得持久的治疗反应,这凸显了深入理解调控免疫环境和治疗反应机制的必要性。在此,研究应用整合性多组学方法对多个大型独立数据集进行分析,以刻画DLBCL免疫环境特征,并明确其与肿瘤细胞内在基因组改变以及CD19靶向CAR T细胞和CD20 CD3 BsAb治疗结局之间的关联。该方法有效地将DLBCL分为4个免疫象限(IQ),由细胞起源和免疫相关基因集表达评分定义。这些象限包括活化B细胞样(ABC)热、ABC冷、生发中心B细胞样(GCB)热和GCB冷DLBCL。每个IQ中均富集了复发性基因组改变,提示淋巴瘤细胞内在改变对塑造独特的DLBCL免疫环境有显著贡献。例如,SOCS1功能丧失突变在GCB热DLBCL中显著富集,识别出一个可能天然对免疫治疗敏感的炎症性DLBCL推定亚群。在复发/难治性DLBCL患者中,DLBCL-IQ分型与CD20 CD3 BsAb的临床获益显著相关(N = 74),但与CD19靶向CAR T细胞无关(Stanford,N = 51;Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center,N = 69)。因此,DLBCL-IQ为概念化DLBCL免疫景观提供了新框架,并提示内源性免疫环境对BsAb治疗结局的影响比CAR T细胞治疗更为显著。
Most patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) treated with immunotherapies such as bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) or chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells fail to achieve durable treatment responses, underscoring the need for a deeper understanding of mechanisms that regulate the immune environment and response to treatment. Here, an integrative multiomics approach was applied to multiple large independent data sets to characterize DLBCL immune environments and to define their association with tumor cell-intrinsic genomic alterations and outcomes to CD19-directed CAR T-cell and CD20 CD3 BsAb therapies. This approach effectively segregated DLBCLs into 4 immune quadrants (IQs) defined by cell-of-origin and immune-related gene set expression scores. These quadrants consisted of activated B cell-like (ABC) hot, ABC cold, germinal center B cell-like (GCB) hot, and GCB cold DLBCLs. Recurrent genomic alterations were enriched in each IQ, suggesting that lymphoma cell-intrinsic alterations contribute significantly to orchestrating unique DLBCL immune environments. For instance, SOCS1 loss-of-function mutations were significantly enriched among GCB hot DLBCLs, identifying a putative subset of inflamed DLBCLs that may be inherently susceptible to immunotherapy. In patients with relapsed/refractory DLBCL, DLBCL-IQ assignment correlated significantly with clinical benefit with a CD20 CD3 BsAb (N = 74), but not with CD19-directed CAR T cells (Stanford, N = 51; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, N = 69). Thus, DLBCL-IQ provides a new framework to conceptualize the DLBCL immune landscape and suggests the endogenous immune environment has a more significant impact on outcomes to BsAb than CAR T-cell treatment.
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。