← 返回前沿论文

人工智能驱动的 TIL(肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞)空间分析作为胆道癌患者免疫检查点抑制剂的潜在生物标志物

英文原题:Artificial Intelligence-Powered Spatial Analysis of Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes as a Potential Biomarker for Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Patients with Biliary Tract Cancer.

PubMed 2024/10/15(内容时间) Clin Cancer Res Q1 · IF 10.9(JCR 2025)

研究概要

基于空间 TIL 分析的 AI-IP 可有效预测接受 anti-PD1 治疗的 BTC 患者的疗效结局。仍需在 anti-PD1/L1 联合吉西他滨-顺铂的背景下进一步验证。

研究思路结论见上方概要

近年来,抗程序性细胞死亡-1/抗程序性细胞死亡配体-1(anti-PD1/L1)免疫治疗联合细胞毒性化疗在晚期胆道癌(BTC)的随机3期试验中已显示出疗效。然而,在BTC中尚未建立可预测anti-PD1/L1获益的生物标志物。在此,我们使用人工智能驱动的免疫表型(AI-IP)分析,评估了接受anti-PD1治疗的晚期BTC中的TIL(肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞)。

339例接受抗PD1作为二线及以上治疗的晚期BTC患者的治疗前苏木精-伊红(H&E)染色全切片图像,被用于AI-IP分析以及AI-IP与抗PD1疗效结局之间的相关性分析。接下来,额外分析了来自癌症基因组图谱(TCGA)的BTC队列的数据和图像,以评估BTC中不同AI-IP的转录组学和突变特征。

总体而言,AI-IP 被分为炎症型[高瘤内 TIL(iTIL)]40 例(11.8%)、免疫排斥型(低 iTIL 和高基质 TIL)167 例(49.3%)以及免疫荒漠型(总体 TIL 低)132 例(38.9%)。炎症型 IP 组的总体缓解率显著高于非炎症型 IP 组(27.5% vs. 7.7%,P < 0.001)。炎症型 IP 组的中位总生存期和无进展生存期均显著长于非炎症型 IP 组(OS,12.6 vs. 5.1 个月;P = 0.002;PFS,4.5 vs. 1.9 个月;P < 0.001)。在 TCGA 队列分析中,炎症型 IP 相较于非炎症型 IP 表现出细胞溶解活性评分和 IFN 特征升高。

展开英文摘要原文

PURPOSE: Recently, anti-programmed cell death-1/anti-programmed cell death ligand-1 (anti-PD1/L1) immunotherapy has been demonstrated for its efficacy when combined with cytotoxic chemotherapy in randomized phase 3 trials for advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC). However, no biomarker predictive of benefit has been established for anti-PD1/L1 in BTC. Here, we evaluated tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) using artificial intelligence-powered immune phenotype (AI-IP) analysis in advanced BTC treated with anti-PD1. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Pretreatment hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained whole-slide images from 339 patients with advanced BTC who received anti-PD1 as second-line treatment or beyond, were employed for AI-IP analysis and correlative analysis between AI-IP and efficacy outcomes with anti-PD1. Next, data and images of the BTC cohort from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) were additionally analyzed to evaluate the transcriptomic and mutational characteristics of various AI-IP in BTC. RESULTS: Overall, AI-IP were classified as inflamed [high intratumoral TIL (iTIL)] in 40 patients (11.8%), immune-excluded (low iTIL and high stromal TIL) in 167 patients (49.3%), and immune-desert (low TIL overall) in 132 patients (38.9%). The inflamed IP group showed a substantially higher overall response rate compared with the noninflamed IP groups (27.5% vs. 7.7%, P < 0.001). Median overall survival and progression-free survival were significantly longer in the inflamed IP group than in the noninflamed IP group (OS, 12.6 vs. 5.1 months; P = 0.002; PFS, 4.5 vs. 1.9 months; P < 0.001). In the TCGA cohort analysis, the inflamed IP showed increased cytolytic activity scores and IFN signature compared with the noninflamed IP. CONCLUSIONS: AI-IP based on spatial TIL analysis was effective in predicting the efficacy outcomes in patients with BTC treated with anti-PD1 therapy. Further validation is necessary in the context of anti-PD1/L1 plus gemcitabine-cisplatin.

论文信息

作者
Bang YH、Lee CK、Bang K、Kim HD、Kim KP、Jeong JH、Park I、Ryoo BY
单位
Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.South Korea
期刊
Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2024 Oct 15
原文标识
PubMed 39150517 · DOI 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-24-1265