决定异体 CAR T 细胞排斥与扩增的细胞和分子机制
Cellular and molecular mechanisms determining allogeneic CAR T cell rejection and expansion.
我们评估了11例接受单一批次cemacabtagene ansegedleucel(cema-cel)治疗的大B细胞淋巴瘤患者,cemacabtagene ansegedleucel是一种异体抗CD19 CAR T产品。
英文原题:Molecular relapse monitoring reveals the domination of impaired NK cell education over impaired inhibition in missing KIR-ligand recognition in patients after unrelated hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for malignant diseases.
移植HLA和/或KIR不匹配的异基因造血干细胞可使NK细胞进入不同的激活/抑制或教育/重置状态,并改变抗肿瘤免疫监视。
HLA和/或KIR错配的同种异体造血干细胞移植可导致NK细胞处于不同的激活/抑制或教育/重置状态,并改变抗肿瘤免疫监视。在本研究中,我们采用分子复发监测来探讨缺失配体识别或同源iKIR-HLA配对变异与需要同种异体造血干细胞移植(allo-HSCT)的血液系统恶性肿瘤患者临床结局之间的相关性。本研究纳入2012年至2020年间在我中心接受来自HLA相合或部分错配无关供者T细胞充足移植物的患者(N = 418),包括急性髓系白血病(AML)、慢性髓系白血病(CML)、急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL)、骨髓增生异常综合征(MDS)或淋巴瘤患者。缺失配体识别通过评估受者是否存在供者所表达的特定抑制性KIR(iKIR)的HLA配体来判定。抑制性KIR-HLA配对数量变异定义为:与供者相比,在受者新的HLA环境中丢失或获得新的HLA-KIR同源配对。综合我们的研究结果,我们得出以下结论:(i)对于在疾病标准阶段接受allo-HSCT的患者,C1、C2和/或Bw4组iKIR-HLA同源配对的丢失导致无病生存期(DFS)、分子复发、总生存期(OS)和非复发死亡率(NRM)显著恶化。这一现象在晚期血液系统恶性肿瘤接受移植的患者中未观察到。(ii) 在不考虑HLA错配比例的情况下,缺失配体识别没有影响;然而,在比较组中对HLA错配水平进行调整后,凸显了缺失配体组合的不良影响。(iii) 调整后缺失配体的不良影响表明,在移植后受者新的HLA环境中,NK细胞教育缺失的影响超过了NK细胞抑制缺失。我们的结果提示,在allo-HSCT供者选择过程中,应避免选择移植后丢失iKIR-HLA同源配对的供者,并应优先选择提供额外iKIR-HLA同源配对的供者。
Transplantation of HLA and/or KIR mismatched allogeneic hematopoietic stem cells can lead NK cells to different states of activation/inhibition or education/resetting and change anti-tumor immunosurveillance. In this study, we used molecular relapse monitoring to investigate a correlation between either missing ligand recognition or variation of the cognate iKIR-HLA pairs with clinical outcomes in patients with hematological malignancies requiring allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Patients (N = 418) with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), or lymphoma receiving T-cell repleted graft from HLA-matched or partly mismatched unrelated donors between 2012 and 2020 in our center were included in this study. Missing-ligand recognition was assessed through the presence or absence of recipients' HLA ligand for a particular inhibitory KIR (iKIR) exhibited by the donor. Inhibitory KIR-HLA pair number variation was defined by loss or gain of a new cognate pair of HLA-KIR within the new HLA environment of the recipient, compared with the donor's one. Considering the results of our research, we drew the following conclusions: (i) loss of iKIR-HLA cognate pair for C1, C2, and/or Bw4 groups led to significant deterioration of disease-free survival (DFS), molecular relapse, overall survival (OS) and non-relapse mortality (NRM) for patients undergoing allo-HSCT in the standard phase of the disease. This phenomenon was not observed in patients who underwent transplantation in advanced hematological cancer. (ii) The missing ligand recognition had no impact if the proportion of HLA mismatches was not considered; however, adjustments of HLA mismatch level in the compared groups highlighted the adverse effect of the missing ligand constellation. (iii) The adverse effect of adjusted missing ligand suggests a predominance of lost NK cell education over lost NK cell inhibition in posttransplant recipients' new HLA environment. Our results suggested that donors with the loss of an iKIR-HLA cognate pair after transplantation should be avoided, and donors who provided an additional iKIR-HLA cognate pair should be preferred in the allo-HSCT donor selection process.
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。