工程化益生菌用于肿瘤靶向联合化学免疫治疗
Engineered probiotics for tumor-targeted combination chemoimmunotherapy.
我们的方法将酶/前药治疗和免疫治疗整合到一个单一的细菌递送系统中,通过提供合理设计的空间控制化学免疫治疗框架,克服了传统疗法的关键局限性。
英文原题:Immunotherapy and Targeted Therapies Efficacy in Thymic Epithelial Tumors: A Systematic Review.
尽管研究存在异质性,本综述表明,对于一线化疗后不适合根治性治疗的特定TET患者,ICI可能是一种治疗选择。
胸腺上皮肿瘤(TET)是前纵隔的罕见肿瘤。手术是可切除TET的主要治疗手段,而全身治疗则用于不可切除和转移性肿瘤。免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)和靶向治疗等新疗法的开发在其他类型的实体瘤中显示出有希望的结果,这促使研究者探索其在TET中的潜在疗效。肿瘤微环境(TME)的研究是另一个引起研究者兴趣的领域。考虑到胸腺的复杂结构及其在免疫发育中的功能,研究者将重点放在可能预测ICI疗效的TME要素上。
本系统评价的主要目的是探讨ICI在TET中的疗效。次要目的包括ICI的毒性、靶向治疗在TET中的疗效,以及评估可能作为ICI疗效预测因素的TME要素。于2023年2月在Ovid Medline和SciVerse Scopus数据库进行了文献检索。
共检索到2944篇摘要,其中31篇被纳入系统评价。五项II期研究和一项回顾性研究评估了ICI的疗效。总体缓解率(ORR)从0%到34%不等。中位无进展生存期(PFS)为3.8至8.6个月,在胸腺癌(TC)中较低(3.8-4.2个月)。中位总生存期(OS)为14.1至35.4个月。治疗相关不良事件发生于6.6%至27.3%的患者中。十六项研究评估了靶向治疗。活性最强的分子是lenvatinib,在TC患者中ORR为38%,而imatinib、erlotinib联合bevacizumab以及saracatinib未检测到活性。十项研究评估了可预测ICI疗效的TME要素。四项研究聚焦于肿瘤浸润免疫细胞,提示TC患者中TIL(肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞)密度高者结局改善。另一项研究表明,癌症间质中的CD8+、CD20+和CD204+肿瘤浸润免疫细胞可能是TC的预后生物标志物。另一项研究将免疫相关长链非编码RNA确定为ICI应答的预测因子。一项研究将肿瘤突变负荷确定为ICI疗效的预测因素。
BACKGROUND: Thymic epithelial tumors (TET) are rare neoplasms of the anterior mediastinum. Surgery is the mainstay treatment for resectable TET, whereas systemic treatments are reserved for unresectable and metastatic tumors. The development of new treatments, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and targeted therapies, with promising results in other types of solid tumors, has led to the investigation of their potential efficacy in TET. The study of tumor microenvironments (TME) is another field of investigation that has gained the interest of researchers. Taking into account the complex structure of the thymus and its function in the development of immunity, researchers have focused on TME elements that could predict ICI efficacy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The primary objective of this systematic review was to investigate the efficacy of ICI in TET. Secondary objectives included the toxicity of ICI, the efficacy of targeted therapies in TET, and the evaluation of the elements of TME that may be predictive factors of ICI efficacy. A literature search was conducted in February 2023 using the Ovid Medline and SciVerse Scopus databases. RESULTS: 2944 abstracts were retrieved, of which 31 were retained for the systematic review. Five phase II and one retrospective study assessed ICI efficacy. The overall response rate (ORR) varied from 0% to 34%. Median progression-free survival (PFS) ranged from 3.8 to 8.6 months, being lower in thymic carcinoma (TC) (3.8-4.2 months). Median overall survival (OS) ranged from 14.1 to 35.4 months. Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 6.6% to 27.3% of patients. Sixteen studies assessed targeted therapies. The most active molecule was lenvatinib, with 38% ORR in patients with TC while no activity was detected for imatinib, erlotinib plus bevacizumab, and saracatinib. Ten studies assessed TME elements that could predict ICI efficacy. Four studies focused on the tumor-infiltrating immune cells suggesting improved outcomes in patients with TC and high tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte densities. Another study showed that CD8+, CD20+, and CD204+ tumor-infiltrating immune cells in cancer stroma might be prognostic biomarkers in TC. Another study identified the immune-related long non-coding RNAs as a predictor of response to ICI. Tumor mutational burden was identified as a predictive factor of ICI efficacy in one study. CONCLUSIONS: Despite study heterogeneity, this review shows that ICI could be a therapeutic option for selected patients with TET that are not amenable to curative radical treatment after first-line chemotherapy.
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。