← 返回前沿论文

免疫逃逸表型在 Richter 转化弥漫大 B 细胞淋巴瘤变异型中常见

英文原题:Immune evasion phenotype is common in Richter transformation diffuse large B-cell lymphoma variant.

PubMed 2023/03/03(内容时间) Virchows Arch Q2 · IF 3(JCR 2025)

研究概要

研究组由64例RT-DLBCL患者组成。

中文摘要

免疫检查点抑制剂(PD-1抑制剂)在Richter转化-弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤变异型(RT-DLBCL)中显示出临床活性,从而提供了一种新的治疗途径。研究组由64例RT-DLBCL患者组成。使用免疫组织化学评估PD-1、PD-L1、CD30的表达及微卫星不稳定性(MSI)状态(hMLH1、hMSH2、hMSH6、PMS1)。使用显色原位杂交评估EBV编码RNA(EBER)。PD-1和PD-L1表达水平根据肿瘤细胞表达分类如下:阴性(< 5%)、阳性至低阳性(5-50%)或高阳性(> 50%)。"免疫逃逸表型"(IEP)定义为肿瘤细胞上PD-1和/或PD-L1高阳性表达的RT-DLBCL病例。PD1阳性TIL(肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞)(TILs)的水平估计为占总淋巴细胞的比例,并分类为阴性/低 vs. 活跃(> 20%)。28/64(43.7%)例患者被定性为IEP+ RT-DLBCL。活跃水平的PD1+ TILs在IEP+肿瘤中显著比IEP-肿瘤更常见(17/28,60.7% vs. 5/34,14.7%;p = 0.001)。此外,CD30表达在IEP+ RT-DLBCL中显著比IEP-更常见(6/20,30% vs. 1/27,3.7%;p = 0.0320)。两例(2/36;5.5%)EBER阳性,均为IEP+。两组在年龄、性别或转化时间方面无显著差异。错配修复蛋白评估显示所有病例均无微卫星不稳定性(MSI)(18/18;100%)。值得注意的是,具有活跃PD1+ TILs的患者与阴性/低浸润的患者相比,OS显著更好(p = 0.0285)。

展开英文摘要原文

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (PD-1 inhibitors) have shown clinical activity in Richter transformation-diffuse large B-cell lymphoma variant (RT-DLBCL), thus providing for a novel therapeutic approach. The study group consists of 64 patients with RT-DLBCL. Expression of PD-1, PD-L1, CD30, and microsatellite instability (MSI) status (hMLH1, hMSH2, hMSH6, PMS1) was assessed using immunohistochemistry. EBV-encoded RNA (EBER) was evaluated using colorimetric in situ hybridization. PD-1 and PD-L1 expression levels were categorized on the basis of tumor cell expression as follows: negative (< 5%), positive to low-positive (5-50%), or high-positive (> 50%). An "immune evasion phenotype" (IEP) was defined as RT-DLBCL cases having high-positive expression of PD-1 and/or PD-L1 on tumor cells. The level of PD1-positive tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) was estimated as a fraction of total lymphocytes and categorized as negative/low vs. brisk (> 20%). 28/64 (43.7%) patients were characterized as IEP+ RT-DLBCL. A brisk level of PD1+ TILs was significantly more common in IEP1+ compared with IEP- tumors (17/28, 60.7% vs. 5/34, 14.7%; p = 0.001). In addition, CD30 expression was significantly more common in IEP+ compared with IEP- RT-DLBCL (6/20, 30% vs. 1/27, 3.7%; p = 0.0320). Two (2/36; 5.5%) cases were positive for EBER, both IEP+. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of age, sex, or time to transformation. Assessment of mismatch repair proteins demonstrated absence of microsatellite instability (MSI) in all cases (18/18; 100%). Notably, patients with brisk PD1+ TILs had a significantly better OS compared to those with a negative/low infiltrate (p = 0.0285).

论文信息

作者
El Hussein S、Medeiros LJ、Gruschkus SK、Wei P、Schlette E、Fang H、Jelloul FZ、Wang W
第一作者单位
Department of Hematopathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. elhusseinsiba@gmail.com.United States
通讯作者单位
Department of Hematopathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. jkhoury@unmc.edu.United States
期刊
Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2023 Jun
原文标识
PubMed 36864257 · DOI 10.1007/s00428-023-03520-x