← 返回前沿论文

idecabtagene vicleucel 与常规治疗在加拿大和法国三类药物暴露的复发/难治性多发性骨髓瘤患者中的成本效果

英文原题:Cost-effectiveness of idecabtagene vicleucel compared with conventional care in triple-class exposed relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma patients in Canada and France.

PubMed 2023/01/01(内容时间) J Med Econ Q1 · IF 3.1(JCR 2025)

研究概要

在进展性、三药暴露的 RRMM 患者中,ide-cel 在生命年(LYs)和质量调整生命年(QALYs)两方面均与显著的生存改善相关。

中文摘要

背景:嵌合抗原受体(CAR)T细胞疗法idecabtagene vicleucel(ide-cel)已获批用于成人复发/难治性多发性骨髓瘤(RRMM)患者;这些患者既往接受过免疫调节剂、蛋白酶体抑制剂和抗CD38抗体治疗,且疾病在最近一次治疗期间进展。本研究旨在评估ide-cel相对于常规治疗在加拿大和法国的成本效果。方法:采用分区生存模型,根据生命年(LY)、质量调整生命年(QALY)和成本,估计ide-cel(目标剂量4.5×10⁸ CAR T细胞)用于获批适应证时的成本效果。模型参数来自KarMMa II期临床试验(clinicaltrials.gov NCT03361748)和KarMMa-RW研究的患者层面数据;对观察期后的总生存期和无进展生存期采用标准参数函数进行外推。模型采用加拿大和法国的社会视角,时间范围为终生。成本、效用、贴现率(加拿大1.5%,法国2.5%)和一般人群死亡率均按国家分别设定。结果:基础分析显示,与常规治疗相比,ide-cel带来更多生命年(分别增加2.64和2.51年)和QALY(分别增加2.31和2.54),增量成本在加拿大为588,490加元,在法国为392,251欧元。ide-cel的增量成本效果比(ICER)在加拿大为每QALY 255,245加元,在法国为每QALY 154,593欧元。结论:对于三类药物均暴露且疾病进展的RRMM患者,ide-cel显著改善生命年和QALY方面的生存结局。其ICER与其他已获批且获报销的RRMM疗法相近。

展开英文摘要原文

BACKGROUND: The chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel) is approved for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) who have already received an immunomodulatory agent, a proteasome inhibitor, and an anti-CD38 antibody and have progressed on their last therapy. The objective of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of ide-cel versus conventional care in Canada and France. METHODS: A partitioned survival model was used to estimate the cost-effectiveness of ide-cel (target dose 450 10 6 CAR T cells) in its approved indication in terms of life-years (LYs), quality-adjusted LYs (QALYs), and costs. Patient-level data from the KarMMa Phase II clinical trial (clinicaltrials.gov NCT03361748) and KarMMa-RW study were used to inform the model; overall and progression-free survival were extrapolated using standard parametric functions after the observed periods. The model adopted Canadian and French societal perspectives over a lifetime horizon. Costs, utilities, discounting (Canada: 1.5%, France: 2.5%), and general population mortality were country-specific. RESULTS: The base case demonstrated that ide-cel was associated with more additional LYs (+2.64 and +2.51) and QALYs (+2.31 and +2.54) than conventional care at incremental costs of CAN$588,490 and 392,251 in Canada and France, respectively. The resulting incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for ide-cel was $255,245 per QALY in Canada, and 154,593 per QALY in France. CONCLUSION: Ide-cel was associated with significant survival improvements in terms of both LYs and QALYs in patients with progressive triple-class-exposed RRMM. The ICER for ide-cel was similar to that of other approved and reimbursed RRMM therapies.

论文信息

作者
Karampampa K、Zhang W、Venkatachalam M、Cotte FE、Dhanda D
第一作者单位
Bristol Myers Squibb, Uxbridge, UK.United Kingdom
通讯作者单位
Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA.United States
期刊
Journal of medical economics2023 Jan-Dec
原文标识
PubMed 36705644 · DOI 10.1080/13696998.2023.2173466