研究概要
CLDN18.2阳性GC显示出独特的免疫微环境特征,这对CLDN18.2靶向治疗的开发具有重要意义。然而,CLDN18.2相关微环境特征对预后的影响仍需进一步研究。
研究思路结论见上方概要
背景
FAST研究确定claudin-18(CLDN18.2)是胃癌(GC)有前景的新治疗靶点。然而,CLDN18.2阳性GC的肿瘤免疫微环境和临床病理特征尚不清楚,这使得开发和优化CLDN18.2靶向治疗变得困难。
方法
本研究纳入80例GC患者,其中60例接受了抗PD-1/PD-L1治疗。采用多重免疫组化(m-IHC)标记CD4/CD8/CD20/CD66b/CD68/CD163/PD-1/PD-L1/TIM-3/LAG-3/FoxP3/CTLA-4/HLA-DR/STING和CLDN18.2,以解析从这些患者分离的福尔马林固定、石蜡包埋肿瘤组织中T细胞、B细胞、巨噬细胞和中性粒细胞的比率及空间分布。分别采用两独立样本t检验和log-rank检验分析按CLDN18.2表达分层的肿瘤免疫微环境特征和患者生存。
结果
我们将肿瘤细胞中CLDN18.2中度至强表达≥40%视为阳性的cut-off值。CLDN18.2阳性肿瘤中CD8 + PD-1 -、CD8 + LAG-3 - 和CD8 + TIM-3 - T细胞的比例显著高于阴性肿瘤(分别为0.039 vs. 0.026,P = 0.009;0.050 vs.0.035,P = 0.024;0.045 vs. 0.032,P = 0.038)。此外,CLDN18.2阳性组的中性粒细胞(CD66b +)数量高于阴性组(分别为0.081 vs. 0.055,P = 0.031),而M1(CD68 + CD163 - HLA-DR +)、M2巨噬细胞(CD68 + CD163 + HLA-DR -)和B细胞(CD20 +)的比例在CLDN18.2阳性组和阴性组之间相当。在20-μm范围内,CLDN18.2阳性肿瘤周围CD8 + PD-1 -、CD8 + LAG-3 - 和CD8 + TIM-3 - T细胞的平均数量高于CLDN18.2阴性肿瘤(分别为0.16 vs. 0.09,P = 0.011;0.20 vs. 0.12,P = 0.029;0.18 vs. 0.12,P = 0.047)。此外,在CLDN18.2阳性组中,20-μm范围内被CD8 + PD-1 -、CD8 + LAG-3 - T细胞或M1巨噬细胞包围的肿瘤细胞占所有肿瘤细胞的比例高于CLDN18.2阴性组(分别为10.79% vs. 6.60%,P = 0.015;12.68% vs. 8.70%,P = 0.049;9.08% vs. 6.56%,P = 0.033)。这些发现表明,CLDN18.2阳性GC具有复杂的免疫微环境特征。此外,CLDN18.2阳性组的OS和irOS短于CLDN18.2阴性组(中位OS:23.33 vs.36.6个月,P < 0.001;中位irOS:10.03 vs. 20.13个月,P = 0.044)。
展开英文摘要原文
BACKGROUND: The FAST study identified claudin-18 (CLDN18.2) as a promising novel therapeutic target for gastric cancer (GC). However, the tumor immune microenvironment and clinicopathological features of CLDN18.2-positive GC are unclear, making it difficult to develop and optimize CLDN18.2-targeted treatments.
METHODS: This study included 80 GC patients, 60 of whom received anti-PD-1/PD-L1 treatment. CD4/CD8/CD20/CD66b/CD68/CD163/PD-1/PD-L1/TIM-3/LAG-3/FoxP3/CTLA-4/HLA-DR/STING, and CLDN18.2 were labeled using multiplex immunohistochemistry (m-IHC) to decipher the rate and spatial distribution of T cells, B cells, macrophages, and neutrophils in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor tissues isolated from these patients. Tumor immune-microenvironmental features and patient survival stratified by CLDN18.2 expression were analyzed using two independent-sample t-tests and log-rank tests, respectively.
RESULTS: We considered moderate-to-strong CLDN18.2 expression ≥ 40% of tumor cells as the cut-off for positivity. The proportion of CD8 + PD-1 - , CD8 + LAG-3 - , and CD8 + TIM-3 - T cells was significantly higher in CLDN18.2-positive tumors than in negative tumors (0.039 vs. 0.026, P = 0.009; 0.050 vs.0.035, P = 0.024; 0.045 vs. 0.032, P = 0.038, respectively). In addition, the number of neutrophils (CD66b + ) was higher in the CLDN18.2-positive group than in the negative group (0.081 vs. 0.055, P = 0.031, respectively), while the rates of M1 (CD68 + CD163 - HLA-DR + ), M2 macrophages (CD68 + CD163 + HLA-DR - ), and B cells (CD20 + ) were comparable between the CLDN18.2-positive and negative groups. The average numbers of CD8 + PD-1 - , CD8 + LAG-3 - , and CD8 + TIM-3 - T cells surrounding tumor cells within a 20-μm range were higher in CLDN18.2-positive tumors than in the CLDN18.2-negative tumors (0.16 vs. 0.09, P = 0.011; 0.20 vs. 0.12, P = 0.029; 0.18 vs. 0.12, P = 0.047, respectively). In addition, in the CLDN18.2-positive group, tumor cells surrounded by CD8 + PD-1 - , CD8 + LAG-3 - T cells, or M1 macrophages within a 20-μm range accounted for a higher proportion of all tumor cells than those in the CLDN18.2-negative group (10.79% vs. 6.60%, P = 0.015; 12.68% vs. 8.70%, P = 0.049; 9.08% vs. 6.56%, P = 0.033, respectively). These findings suggest that CLDN18.2-positive GC harbors complex immune-microenvironmental features. Additionally, CLDN18.2-positive group had shorter OS and irOS than CLDN18.2-negative group (median OS: 23.33 vs.36.6 months, P < 0.001; median irOS: 10.03 vs. 20.13 months, P = 0.044, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: CLDN18.2-positive GC displayed unique immune-microenvironmental characteristics, which is of great significance for the development of CLDN18.2-targeted therapies. However, the impact of CLDN18.2-related microenvironmental features on prognosis requires further investigation.
论文信息
- 作者
- Jia K、Chen Y、Sun Y、Hu Y、Jiao L、Ma J、Yuan J、Qi C
- 第一作者单位
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China.China
- 通讯作者单位
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China. shenlin@bjmu.edu.cn.China
- 文献类型
- 非美国政府资助研究
- 期刊
- BMC medicine2022 Jul 11