决定异体 CAR T 细胞排斥与扩增的细胞和分子机制
Cellular and molecular mechanisms determining allogeneic CAR T cell rejection and expansion.
我们评估了11例接受单一批次cemacabtagene ansegedleucel(cema-cel)治疗的大B细胞淋巴瘤患者,cemacabtagene ansegedleucel是一种异体抗CD19 CAR T产品。
英文原题:Vaccination Therapy for Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Where Do We Stand?
免疫治疗正在改变许多血液疾病的治疗格局,其中免疫检查点抑制剂、双特异性抗体和 CAR-T 疗法是其最突出的体现。
免疫疗法正在改变多种血液系统疾病的治疗格局,其代表包括免疫检查点抑制剂、双特异性抗体和CAR-T疗法。遗憾的是,急性髓系白血病(AML)的免疫治疗迄今效果不甚理想,唯一获批药物是抗CD33抗体药物偶联物吉妥珠单抗奥唑米星。AML治疗中一个有前景的研究领域是抗白血病疫苗,通过诱导缓解或预防复发发挥作用。本综述分析AML疫苗的最新证据及其生物学机制。已用于疫苗策略并进入临床试验阶段的主要蛋白包括Wilms瘤1(WT1)、蛋白酶3和RHAMM。大多数数据涉及WT1疫苗,这也与WT1在AML细胞中高表达且突变率较高有关。TLR7激动剂和白细胞介素2等免疫应答刺激剂在体内外也显示抗白血病活性。最后,主要基于自体或异体现货型树突状细胞疫苗的细胞疫苗,在诱导T细胞应答和安全性方面均取得积极结果,老年患者也如此。与其他免疫治疗策略相比,抗AML疫苗毒性较低且更易管理,也适用于体能状态较差的老年患者,并可与现有疗法联合。疫苗最适宜用于治疗性、预防性还是先发性场景仍需进一步研究,但现有证据提示,存在活动性或高肿瘤负荷疾病时效果较差。复发/难治或高危AML预后不佳,因此迫切需要进一步研究支撑其发病机制的生物学通路。在此背景下,需研究免疫疗法新方向,包括疫苗等重要方法,以开发能够通过免疫监视实现长期疾病控制的有效策略。
Immunotherapy is changing the therapeutic landscape of many hematologic diseases, with immune checkpoint inhibitors, bispecific antibodies, and CAR-T therapies being its greatest expression. Unfortunately, immunotherapy in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has given less brilliant results up to now, and the only approved drug is the antiCD33 antibody-drug conjugate gemtuzumab ozogamicin. A promising field of research in AML therapy relies on anti-leukemic vaccination to induce remission or prevent disease relapse. In this review, we analyze recent evidence on AML vaccines and their biological mechanisms. The principal proteins that have been exploited for vaccination strategies and have reached clinical experimental phases are Wilm's tumor 1, proteinase 3, and RHAMM. the majority of data deals with WT1-base vaccines, given also the high expression and mutation rates of WT1 in AML cells. Stimulators of immune responses such as TLR7 agonist and interleukin-2 have also proven anti-leukemic activity both in vivo and in vitro. Lastly, cellular vaccines mainly based on autologous or allogeneic off-the-shelf dendritic cell-based vaccines showed positive results in terms of T-cell response and safety, also in elderly patients. Compared to other immunotherapeutic strategies, anti-AML vaccines have the advantage of being a less toxic and a more manageable approach, applicable also to elderly patients with poorer performance status, and may be used in combination with currently available therapies. As for the best scenario in which to use vaccination, whether in a therapeutic, prophylactic, or preemptive setting, further studies are needed, but available evidence points to poorer results in the presence of active or high-burden disease. Given the poor prognosis of relapsed/refractory or high-risk AML, further research is urgently needed to better understand the biological pathways that sustain its pathogenesis. In this setting, research on novel frontiers of immunotherapy-based agents, among which vaccines represent important actors, is warranted to develop new and efficacious strategies to obtain long-term disease control by immune patrolling.
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。