决定异体 CAR T 细胞排斥与扩增的细胞和分子机制
Cellular and molecular mechanisms determining allogeneic CAR T cell rejection and expansion.
我们评估了11例接受单一批次cemacabtagene ansegedleucel(cema-cel)治疗的大B细胞淋巴瘤患者,cemacabtagene ansegedleucel是一种异体抗CD19 CAR T产品。
英文原题:Chimeric Antigen Receptor Based Cellular Therapy for Treatment Of T-Cell Malignancies.
我们在 www.clinicaltrials.gov 上识别出 49 项注册的 CAR 类疗法研究。
T细胞恶性肿瘤可分为前体肿瘤(T细胞急性淋巴细胞白血病/淋巴母细胞淋巴瘤,T-ALL/LBL)和成熟T细胞肿瘤,后者包含28种不同实体。多数此类恶性肿瘤具有侵袭性,预后较差。复发/难治性(R/R)疾病预后尤其不良,进展后预期生存期仅数月。靶向疗法,如抗CD30免疫毒素brentuximab vedotin、抗CD38抗体daratumumab和抗CCR4抗体mogamulizumab,仅对部分T细胞肿瘤患者有效。表达嵌合抗原受体(CAR)的T细胞(CAR-T)已常规用于治疗R/R B细胞恶性肿瘤,但用于T细胞白血病和淋巴瘤时存在特定障碍,包括同类相残、恶性细胞被转染的风险和T细胞再生障碍。解决方法包括选择靶抗原、采用CRISPR/Cas9或TALEN基因编辑、转录后调节CAR-T表面抗原表达,以及设置安全开关。基因编辑产品中观察到结构性染色体变化和全局基因表达变化。我们在ClinicalTrials.gov中识别出49项已注册的CAR疗法研究,多数靶向CD30或CD7抗原,但只有少数研究已有结果。总体而言,临床应答率超过50%,但已报告的随访时间很短。CAR疗法的特异性毒性,如细胞因子释放综合征(CRS),似乎与靶抗原及生产所用细胞来源有关。抗CD7 CAR-T细胞发生CRS较抗CD30细胞更频繁,但多数为轻度。基因编辑异基因CAR-T细胞治疗后观察到更重CRS。免疫效应细胞相关神经毒性综合征(ICANS)轻微且少见。来自既往造血干细胞供者的异基因CAR-T细胞治疗后也观察到移植物抗宿主病(GvHD)。与抗CD19 CAR-T细胞相似,最常见毒性为血细胞减少。基于CAR的细胞治疗用于T细胞恶性肿瘤似乎可行且有效,但最佳CAR产品设计仍未知,评估其真正潜力需要长期随访。
T-cell malignancies can be divided into precursor (T-acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoblastic lymphoma, T-ALL/LBL) and mature T-cell neoplasms, which are comprised of 28 different entities. Most of these malignancies are aggressive with rather poor prognosis. Prognosis of relapsed/refractory (R/R) disease is especially dismal, with an expected survival only several months after progression. Targeted therapies, such as antiCD30 immunotoxin brentuximab vedotin, antiCD38 antibody daratumumab, and anti-CCR4 antibody mogamulizumab are effective only in subsets of patients with T-cell neoplasms. T-cells equipped with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR-Ts) are routinely used for treatment of R/R B-cell malignancies, however, there are specific obstacles for their use in T-cell leukemias and lymphomas which are fratricide killing, risk of transfection of malignant cells, and T-cell aplasia. The solution for these problems relies on target antigen selection, CRISPR/Cas9 or TALEN gene editing, posttranslational regulation of CAR-T surface antigen expression, and safety switches. Structural chromosomal changes and global changes in gene expression were observed with gene-edited products. We identified 49 studies of CAR-based therapies registered on www.clinicaltrials.gov. Most of them target CD30 or CD7 antigen. Results are available only for a minority of these studies. In general, clinical responses are above 50% but reported follow-up is very short. Specific toxicities of CAR-based therapies, namely cytokine release syndrome (CRS), seem to be connected with the antigen of interest and source of cells for manufacturing. CRS is more frequent in antiCD7 CAR-T cells than in antiCD30 cells, but it is mild in most patients. More severe CRS was observed after gene-edited allogeneic CAR-T cells. Immune effector cell associated neurotoxicity (ICANS) was mild and infrequent. Graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) after allogeneic CAR-T cells from previous hematopoietic stem cell donor was also observed. Most frequent toxicities, similarly to antiCD19 CAR-T cells, are cytopenias. CAR-based cellular therapy seems feasible and effective for T-cell malignancies, however, the optimal design of CAR-based products is still unknown and long-term follow-up is needed for evaluation of their true potential.
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。