胰腺癌空间构型与新辅助治疗和根治性切除术后疾病复发相关
Spatial Configuration of Pancreatic Cancer Is Associated with Disease Recurrence after Neoadjuvant Therapy and Curative-Intent Resection.
从标准H&E切片量化的残留癌-间质拓扑结构在PDAC新辅助治疗后产生独立预后信号,为空间风险提供细胞免疫相关性依据,并推动前瞻性验证及空间信息指导的辅助治疗策略。
英文原题:Insufficiency of compound immune checkpoint blockade to overcome engineered T cell exhaustion in pancreatic cancer.
阻断PD-1信号不足以克服PDA中TCR工程T细胞的功能障碍。我们的研究表明,体外T细胞工程过程中诱导的分化途径和肿瘤内抑制机制共同导致工程T细胞功能障碍,并且对免疫检查点阻断的挽救具有抵抗性。
采用过继性细胞疗法治疗高度致命的胰腺导管腺癌(PDA)一直难以实现稳健的疗效。我们此前表明,经工程化表达间皮素特异性T细胞受体(TCR Msln)的T细胞可在自体PDA中积聚,介导治疗性抗肿瘤活性,但未能根除肿瘤,部分原因在于其获得了功能失调的耗竭T细胞状态。
在此,我们在基因工程PDA小鼠模型中研究了免疫检查点在中介TCR工程T细胞功能障碍中的作用。追踪了要么PD-1缺陷、要么与阻断PD-L1和/或额外免疫检查点的抗体同时转移的工程T细胞的命运,以评估输注后第8天和第28天的持久性、功能性和抗肿瘤活性。我们对从肿瘤中分离的工程T细胞进行了RNAseq,并将差异表达基因与典型的内源性耗竭T细胞进行了比较。
在过继性细胞治疗期间,PD-L1通路阻断和/或同时阻断多种共抑制受体不足以预防自体PDA中工程化T细胞功能障碍,但导致了肺部的亚临床活性,而未增强抗肿瘤免疫。基因表达分析显示,离体TCR工程化T细胞与体内致敏的内源性效应T细胞显著不同,后者能够对免疫检查点抑制剂产生应答。转移后早期,瘤内TCR工程化T细胞获得了与慢性病毒感染期间出现的典型耗竭T细胞相似的分子程序,但随后分子程序出现分化。瘤内工程化T细胞表现出效应基因和细胞周期基因减少,并对TCR信号传导无应答。
BACKGROUND: Achieving robust responses with adoptive cell therapy for the treatment of the highly lethal pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) has been elusive. We previously showed that T cells engineered to express a mesothelin-specific T cell receptor (TCR Msln ) accumulate in autochthonous PDA, mediate therapeutic antitumor activity, but fail to eradicate tumors in part due to acquisition of a dysfunctional exhausted T cell state. METHODS: Here, we investigated the role of immune checkpoints in mediating TCR engineered T cell dysfunction in a genetically engineered PDA mouse model. The fate of engineered T cells that were either deficient in PD-1, or transferred concurrent with antibodies blocking PD-L1 and/or additional immune checkpoints, were tracked to evaluate persistence, functionality, and antitumor activity at day 8 and day 28 post infusion. We performed RNAseq on engineered T cells isolated from tumors and compared differentially expressed genes to prototypical endogenous exhausted T cells. RESULTS: PD-L1 pathway blockade and/or simultaneous blockade of multiple coinhibitory receptors during adoptive cell therapy was insufficient to prevent engineered T cell dysfunction in autochthonous PDA yet resulted in subclinical activity in the lung, without enhancing anti-tumor immunity. Gene expression analysis revealed that ex vivo TCR engineered T cells markedly differed from in vivo primed endogenous effector T cells which can respond to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Early after transfer, intratumoral TCR engineered T cells acquired a similar molecular program to prototypical exhausted T cells that arise during chronic viral infection, but the molecular programs later diverged. Intratumoral engineered T cells exhibited decreased effector and cell cycle genes and were refractory to TCR signaling. CONCLUSIONS: Abrogation of PD-1 signaling is not sufficient to overcome TCR engineered T cell dysfunction in PDA. Our study suggests that contributions by both the differentiation pathways induced during the ex vivo T cell engineering process and intratumoral suppressive mechanisms render engineered T cells dysfunctional and resistant to rescue by blockade of immune checkpoints.
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。