决定异体 CAR T 细胞排斥与扩增的细胞和分子机制
Cellular and molecular mechanisms determining allogeneic CAR T cell rejection and expansion.
我们评估了11例接受单一批次cemacabtagene ansegedleucel(cema-cel)治疗的大B细胞淋巴瘤患者,cemacabtagene ansegedleucel是一种异体抗CD19 CAR T产品。
英文原题:Factors Impacting Overall and Event-Free Survival following Post-Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Consolidative Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.
在这些患者中,34例(74%)接受了首次HSCT,中位随访时间为50.8个月。
造血干细胞移植(HSCT)可用于巩固嵌合抗原受体(CAR)T细胞疗法诱导的复发/难治性B细胞急性淋巴细胞白血病(B-ALL)患者的缓解,但对于CAR后造血干细胞移植(HSCT)影响总生存期(OS)和无事件生存期(EFS)的因素知之甚少。本研究的主要目的是确定在未接受过移植的患者中,CAR诱导完全缓解(CR)后巩固性HSCT与OS和EFS相关的因素。次要目标包括评估所有接受HSCT的患者的OS/EFS、无复发生存期和累积复发率,按首次和第二次HSCT分层,以及CAR诱导缓解后HSCT的耐受性。这是一项回顾性研究,纳入了在美国国家癌症研究所参加1项针对CD19、CD22和CD19/22的3项CAR T细胞试验之一(ClinicalTrials.gov标识符NCT01593696、NCT02315612和NCT03448393)并在CAR T细胞治疗后直接接受HSCT的儿童和年轻成人。2012年7月至2021年2月期间,46名患有前B ALL的儿童和年轻成人在CAR治疗后直接接受HSCT。在这些患者中,34名(74%)接受了首次HSCT,中位随访时间为50.8个月。未接受过移植的患者在CAR T细胞治疗前接受了大量预处理(中位数,3.5线治疗;范围,1至12),并有显著的既往免疫治疗暴露(blinatumomab、inotuzumab和/或接受CD22或CD19/22构建体的患者接受CAR T细胞治疗(88%;15/17))。12名患者(35%)患有原发性难治性疾病,从CAR T细胞输注到HSCT第0天的中位时间为54.5天(范围,42至127天)。首次HSCT后的中位OS为72.2个月(95%置信区间[CI],16.9个月至不可估计[NE]),中位EFS为36.9个月(95% CI,5.2个月至NE)。在12个月和24个月时,OS分别为76.0%(95% CI,57.6%至87.2%)和60.7%(95% CI,40.8%至75.8%),EFS分别为64.6%(95% CI,46.1%至78.1%)和50.9%(95% CI,32.6%至66.6%)。在未接受过移植的患者中,针对CAR后巩固性HSCT的单变量分析中,与OS和EFS降低均相关的个体因素包括:既往≥5线治疗(未达到[NR]对12.4个月,P = .014;NR对4.8个月,P = .063)、既往blinatumomab治疗(NR对16.9个月,P = .0038;NR对4.4个月,P = .0025)、既往inotuzumab治疗(NR对11.5个月,P = .044;36.9个月对2.7个月,P = .0054)以及CAR T细胞治疗前≥5%原始细胞(M2/M3骨髓)(NR对17个月,P = .019;NR对12.2个月,P = .035)。原发难治性疾病与HSCT后OS/EFS改善相关(NR对21.9个月,P = .075;NR对12.2个月,P = .024)。在未接受过移植的患者中,广泛既往治疗,尤其是免疫治疗,以及高疾病负荷,各自均对CAR T细胞后巩固性HSCT后的OS/EFS产生不良影响,主要原因是复发。尽管如此,HSCT仍是长期治愈的重要治疗方式。在多次复发疾病之前更早实施HSCT,并在被确定为HSCT后复发高风险的患者中纳入HSCT后风险缓解策略,可能改善结局。
Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) may be used to consolidate chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy-induced remissions for patients with relapsed/refractory B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL), but little is known about the factors impacting overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) for post-CAR hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). The present study's primary objective was to identify factors associated with OS and EFS for consolidative HSCT following CAR-induced complete remission (CR) in transplantation-na ve patients. Secondary objectives included evaluation of OS/EFS, relapse-free survival and cumulative incidence of relapse for all patients who proceeded to HSCT, stratified by first and second HSCT, as well as the tolerability of HSCT following CAR-induced remission. This was a retrospective review of children and young adults enrolled on 1 of 3 CAR T cell trials at the National Cancer Institute targeting CD19, CD22, and CD19/22 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers NCT01593696, NCT02315612, and NCT03448393) who proceeded directly to HSCT following CAR T cell therapy. Between July 2012 and February 2021, 46 children and young adults with pre-B ALL went directly to HSCT following CAR therapy. Of these patients, 34 (74%) proceeded to a first HSCT, with a median follow-up of 50.8 months. Transplantation-na ve patients were heavily pretreated prior to CAR T cell therapy (median, 3.5 lines of therapy; range, 1 to 12) with significant prior immunotherapy exposure (blinatumomab, inotuzumab, and/or CAR T cell therapy in patients receiving CD22 or CD19/22 constructs (88%; 15 of /17)). Twelve patients (35%) had primary refractory disease, and the median time from CAR T cell infusion to HSCT Day 0 was 54.5 days (range, 42 to 127 days). The median OS following first HSCT was 72.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 16.9 months to not estimable [NE]), with a median EFS of 36.9 months (95% CI, 5.2 months to NE). At 12 and 24 months, the OS was 76.0% (95% CI, 57.6% to 87.2%) and 60.7% (95% CI, 40.8% to 75.8%), respectively, and EFS was 64.6% (95% CI, 46.1% to 78.1%) and 50.9% (95% CI, 32.6% to 66.6%), respectively. The individual factors associated with both decreased OS and EFS in univariate analyses for post-CAR consolidative HSCT in transplantation-na ve patients included 5 prior lines of therapy (not reached [NR] versus 12.4 months, P = .014; NR versus 4.8 months, P = .063), prior blinatumomab therapy (NR versus 16.9 months, P = .0038; NR versus 4.4 months, P = .0025), prior inotuzumab therapy (NR versus 11.5 months, P = .044; 36.9 months versus 2.7 months, P = .0054) and 5% blasts (M2/M3 marrow) pre-CAR T cell therapy (NR versus 17 months, P = .019; NR versus 12.2 months, P = .035). Primary refractory disease was associated with improved OS/EFS post-HSCT (NR versus 21.9 months, P = .075; NR versus 12.2 months, P = .024). Extensive prior therapy, particularly immunotherapy, and high disease burden each individually adversely impacted OS/EFS following post-CAR T cell consolidative HSCT in transplantation-na ve patients, owing primarily to relapse. Despite this, HSCT remains an important treatment modality in long-term cure. Earlier implementation of HSCT before multiply relapsed disease and incorporation of post-HSCT risk mitigation strategies in patients identified to be at high-risk of post-HSCT relapse may improve outcomes.
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。