← 返回前沿论文

局部治疗联合异体γδ T 细胞过继回输治疗晚期肝细胞癌和肝内胆管癌的临床安全性与疗效

英文原题:Clinical Safety and Efficacy of Locoregional Therapy Combined with Adoptive Transfer of Allogeneic γδ T Cells for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma.

PubMed 2021/09/29(内容时间) J Vasc Interv Radiol Q2 · IF 3.1(JCR 2025)

研究概要

局部消融联合过继转移异体γδ细胞的新型联合方案是安全的,对HCC和ICC显示出令人鼓舞的临床疗效。

研究思路结论见上方概要

探讨局部区域治疗联合过继转移异体γδ T细胞对肝细胞癌(HCC)和肝内胆管癌(ICC)患者的安全性和疗效。

30例HCC患者和29例ICC患者被随机分配接受局部区域治疗(HCC,A组,n = 15;ICC,C组,n = 15)或局部区域治疗联合γδ T细胞治疗(HCC,B组,n = 15;ICC,D组,n = 14)。A组和C组仅接受局部消融(冷冻消融或不可逆电穿孔),而B组和D组接受局部区域治疗后过继转移异体γδ T细胞。主要终点为安全性、远处无进展生存期(PFS)、局部PFS和总生存期(OS)。

联合治疗组的中位远处 PFS 显著长于局部区域治疗组(HCC:8 个月 vs 4 个月,P = .04;ICC:8 个月 vs 4 个月,P = .021)。两种治疗方式的局部 PFS 无显著差异。联合治疗组中 HCC 患者的 OS 更长(中位 OS:13 个月 vs 8 个月,P = .029)。然而,两种治疗方式之间 ICC 患者的 OS 无显著差异(中位 OS:9.5 个月 vs 8 个月,P = .546)。所有不良事件均可管理,两组间发生率无显著差异。

展开英文摘要原文

PURPOSE: To investigate the safety and efficacy of locoregional therapy plus adoptive transfer of allogeneic gamma delta (γδ) T cells for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). METHODS: Thirty patients with HCC and 29 patients with ICC were randomly assigned to receive locoregional therapy (HCC, Group A, n = 15; ICC, Group C, n = 15) or locoregional therapy plus γδ T cell therapy (HCC, Group B, n = 15; ICC, Group D, n = 14). Groups A and C only received locoregional ablation (cryoablation or irreversible electroporation), whereas Groups B and D received locoregional therapy followed by adoptive transfer of allogeneic γδ T cells. The primary endpoints were safety, distant progression-free survival (PFS), local PFS, and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: The median distant PFS was significantly longer in the combined treatment groups than the locoregional treatment groups (HCC: 8 vs 4 months, P = .04; ICC: 8 vs 4 months, P = .021). There was no significant difference in local PFS between the 2 treatment modalities. Patients with HCC in the combined treatment group had a longer OS (median OS: 13 vs 8 months, P = .029). However, there was no significant difference in OS in patients with ICC between the 2 treatment modalities (median OS: 9.5 vs 8 months, P = .546). All adverse events were manageable with no significant difference in incidence between groups. CONCLUSIONS: The novel combination of locoregional ablation with adoptive transfer of allogeneic γδ cells was safe, with encouraging clinical efficacy against HCC and ICC.

论文信息

作者
Zhang T、Chen J、Niu L、Liu Y、Ye G、Jiang M、Qi Z
第一作者单位
Medical College of Guangxi University, Nanning, China.China
通讯作者单位
Medical College of Guangxi University, Nanning, China. Electronic address: yxyyz@gxu.edu.cn.China
文献类型
随机对照试验
期刊
Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR2022 Jan
原文标识
PubMed 34600129 · DOI 10.1016/j.jvir.2021.09.012